Laserfiche WebLink
APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE 4" REPORT, April 28, 2007, TO 2007 ATM <br />school operating budget to temporary borrowing (line item 2230) in Shared Expenses; it is hoped these <br />costs reflect a small portion of the projected first -year energy savings from these capital projects. <br />REVOLVING FUNDS <br />In an effort to more clearly track the actual costs and receipts for certain fee -based services, revolving <br />funds for fee-based athletics, and fee-based regular education transportation will be created. The current <br />school revolving fund for gate receipts from various sports events will now include the fee -based portion <br />of athletics. This revolving fund, created by the School Administration under Chapter 71, Section 47 of <br />the Massachusetts General Laws, comes under the authority of the School Committee. The operating <br />budget account will continue to cover the subsidized portion of the athletics programs. <br />When the two school funding questions on the 2006 override failed to pass, the schools had no choice but <br />to raise user fees, cut positions, and cut services and programs to reduce expenses. At that time, the <br />athletics fees were restructured and increased. If the 2007 override does not pass, athletics fees will again <br />be increased, this time from $300 per sport to $500 per sport, with the family cap increasing from $600 to <br />$1,000. <br />State law requires the school district to provide and pay for transportation for all children in grades K-6 <br />who live two miles or farther from their school. Any other children who wish to take the school bus are <br />charged a fee. The bus fee for these students in the past has not reflected the true cost of the service. In <br />FY2008, the bus service will become self funding so the assessed fee will be based on the actual cost of <br />transporting these children. The increase in bus rates will most likely cause a decrease in bus riders, an <br />increase in families driving individually to the schools, and the unintended consequences of more traffic <br />and pollution. However, given the tight budget, the School Committee has approved the elimination of <br />the subsidy for non - mandated transportation. <br />The receipts from paying bus riders will be collected in the to -be- created Transportation Revolving Fund. <br />This type of revolving fund, as defined in Chapter 44, Section 53E' /z of the Massachusetts General Laws, <br />may be established administratively for the first year, but will need to be, in each future year, reauthorized <br />by a vote of Town Meeting. Starting in FY2008, there will be three sources of financing to support <br />regular education transportation: 1) General Fund revenue; 2) revenue from the Transportation Revolving <br />Fund; and 3) the School Bus Transportation Stabilization Fund created to support the transportation of <br />students from Avalon Bay. <br />SPECIAL EDUCATION (SPED) D' xPENSES <br />Because SPED expenses are such a significant and challenging part of the school budget, we have elected <br />to discuss these expenses in a separate section. This section deals in particular with three elements of the <br />FY2008 SPED budget: out -of- district tuitions, transportation, and new programs. <br />OUT -oF- DISTRICT TUITIONS <br />When the Town is unable to meet the needs of a SPED student within the Lexington Public School <br />system, State law requires that the student be sent to a program outside of Lexington to receive services <br />and the Town must pay for these services. Out -of- district tuitions represent a highly volatile expense, as <br />annual tuitions per student can cost more than $200,000 per year and it is often difficult to predict <br />changes in a student's placement. From March to November 2006, for example, there were 32 changes in <br />placement status, 10 of which were new out -of- district students and 22 of which were students who <br />changed from one out -of- district school to another; these changes in placement resulted in additions to the <br />SPED budget of $1.05 million. In 2006, the school administration implemented new procedures to enable <br />it better to forecast and track these expenditures as well as to find less expensive alternatives than sending <br />students out -of- district. (See New Programs below.) <br />Tuition for students requiring out -of- district services is projected to increase by $624,920 in FY2008 <br />compared to the FY2007 budget, an increase of 14.4 %, net of reimbursement received under the circuit <br />breaker program (discussed below). Since the budgeted number of students is the same as the original <br />budget for FY2007, the budgeted increase in spending is the result of an assumed 5% inflation rate in <br />tuition expenses for this student population as well as expense increases incurred when students change <br />Page 8 of 13 <br />