Laserfiche WebLink
APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE REPORT, OCTOBER 9, 2007 TO STM <br />than the corresponding numbers in row (1). Thus we conclude, as one would expect, that if the TIF <br />agreement is not approved but Shire nonetheless proceeds with its full plan, the Town is better off than if <br />the TIF is approved. Similarly, three of four numbers in row (3) and two of four numbers in row (4) are <br />higher than their counterparts in row (1). On the other hand, the numbers in rows (5) and (6) are all lower <br />than the corresponding numbers in row (1). <br />It has been argued that a tax reduction of some $5M to $8M represents less than I% of the expenses that <br />Shire will likely incur in implementing its stated plans over the next 20 years if the project goes forward, <br />and therefore the magnitude of the TIF is rather unlikely to be a significant factor in Shire's determination <br />of the location of the manufacturing facility and additional lab /office space. If this is true, then Shire <br />might be expected to locate the facility in Lexington if the TIF agreement was less favorable to them and <br />possibly even if no agreement is approved by Town Meeting (though one should not forget that <br />approximately $5M in additional investment tax credits from the State will only be available to Shire if a <br />TIF agreement is approved). <br />If Shire's decision, in fact, does hinge upon Town Meeting's approval of the TIF but the TIF is not <br />approved, then one needs to compare the numbers in row (1) with those in rows (3) through (6). If another <br />tenant that wishes to fully develop the 200 and 400 Patriot Way parcels emerges in only one year (see row <br />(3)), the Town scores a win IF the forthcoming development is comparable in assessed value to the kind <br />of development envisioned by Shire. If the new tenant only develops office space, for instance, the <br />property's values will not yield as much revenue as a Shire -like development; this is illustrated by <br />comparing, e.g., the $30.79M in Scenario (I a) and the $19.47M in Scenario (3d). If the wait for a new <br />tenant is two years, it's a wash with a comparable tenant and a loss for a (similarly sized) office space use. <br />If the wait is longer than about two years, the net revenue will be less than under the current proposal. <br />The worst case among those we have considered is one where parcels 200 and 400 are never developed <br />(see row (6)). The results demonstrate a substantial loss for the town relative to that in row (1). It is <br />worth noting that these conclusions are independent of assumptions on future tax rates. Future tax rates <br />only affect the magnitude of the differences between scenarios, not which scenario will net the Town the <br />most revenue. <br />The TIF agreement before Town Meeting presents an opportunity for a significant increase in property <br />tax revenue. If the agreement is revised to be more favorable to the Town or if no agreement is reached, <br />and Shire, counter to statements made to date by its representatives, nonetheless proceeds to build <br />buildings at 200 and 400 Patriot Way, the Town would receive an increase in net revenue that could be as <br />much as 10% larger than that to be received under the Shire/TIF plan. However, if the TIF is not <br />approved and Shire does not develop the 200 and 400 parcels, then, it is highly uncertain as to how and <br />when these parcels will be developed. If this tikes many years, then the new revenue could be as low as <br />50% of that to be received under the full Shire /TIF plan. We cannot estimate the chances that Shire will <br />proceed with a development of the 200 and 400 parcels even if the present agreement is not approved, nor <br />can we estimate the prospects that other companies will want to build there in the next few years or <br />whether they'll build lab /manufacturing space (which is assessed at a higher value than office space); the <br />chances could be good if the commercial real estate market continues to tighten and remains tight for a <br />while, or they could be poor especially if the commercial real estate market weakens within the next <br />couple of years. It has been a long time since a new office /lab /manufacturing building of comparable size <br />has been built in Lexington. <br />In short, if the TIF agreement before Town Meeting is not approved we put much of the potential revenue <br />increase at risk in order to modestly increase that potential. We do not believe that the risk is worthwhile, <br />and therefore we unanimously recommend approval of the agreement as it currently stands. <br />Page 7 of 18 <br />