Laserfiche WebLink
APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE REPORT TO 2008 ATM —March 19, 2008 <br />We are gratified to see that the Schools and the Public Facilities Department are planning to conduct <br />studies of facilities needs (see Articles 18 and 19). This is important for the accuracy of projections of <br />future needs for capital investments. Such studies should be extended in future years to other aspects of <br />the Town's facilities and equipment. We also note that this Committee strongly supports the use of <br />Community Preservation Act (CPA) funds to maintain Town buildings and facilities to the extent that the <br />proposed projects qualify for CPA funds and make sense. <br />FY2010 and bevond <br />Our projection of expenses and revenues in FY2010 is presented in the Appendix. It shows that the <br />maintenance of the current level of services will likely cost some millions more than the revenues that <br />will be available. We have not quantified the uncertainties in the growth of each of the major components <br />of expenses and revenues. Indeed, recent experience teaches us that it is difficult to predict the size of a <br />budget gap more than a year in advance with a precision of better than $1M or even $2M. Nonetheless, <br />the lesson is that we should be wary of letting operating costs grow too fast. In the spirit of this lesson, <br />concern about the sustainability of increases in the operating budget was expressed by members of this <br />Committee during the budget development this year. We wonder whether a similar amount of Free Cash <br />and other non - recurring sources of funds can be expected to be available to support the FY2010 operating <br />budget as is being used for FY2009. The amount recommended to be used this year, i.e., just over $2.6M, <br />is large enough that there are real risks that a similar amount may not be available in FY2010, especially <br />in light of the current economic slowdown. <br />Continuation of the street reconstruction and resurfacing program at the FY2009 level will not meet the <br />Town's long -term needs (and possibly even the short -term needs) for street and sidewalk maintenance <br />and new sidewalk construction. Rather, the Town will need to approve a debt exclusion or override in <br />order to keep up; the DPW has floated a preliminary figure of $15M to cover eight years of street <br />maintenance work. A debt exclusion for street paving could also cover the $700K General Fund debt <br />financing proposed this year for the reconstruction of Woburn St. The precise parameters of a <br />supplemental street maintenance program should become a topic of conversation starting late this spring <br />or this summer. Sidewalk work should be part of the discussion. <br />Among the other factors affecting FY2010, we need to keep in mind that the in -levy debt service for that <br />year will be about $500K higher than it is in FY2009 (see page XI -3 in the Brown Book). The estimate <br />for FY2010 debt service was done prior to the recent (February) issuance of about $20M in bonds <br />wherein the Town, with the help of its Aaa rating, received a very favorable interest rate of 3.75 %. <br />Nonetheless, the debt service in FY2010 will still increase significantly. <br />A three year perspective here might be valuable. If one compares the FY2009 budget to FY2006, one <br />would see that, factoring out the successful override for FY2008, the town's principal and recurring <br />sources of revenue (tax levy, state aid, and local receipts) grew at 3.8% while general fund expenses grew <br />at 7.8 %. Assuming that the town does not desire to see major cuts in services nor build budgets <br />predicated on non - recurring revenues, and projecting into the future this 4% difference between expense <br />growth and revenue growth, one inevitably is led to the conclusion that future budgets can only be <br />balanced through (1) passing operating overrides; (2) finding significant new sources of revenue, and/or <br />(3) finding ways to deliver services at lower cost. Initiatives such as the agreement with Shire and the <br />new programs in our schools to reduce special education expenses are examples of the latter two methods, <br />respectively, and should be applauded. Given the large increases in the Town's expenses for health <br />insurance over the last ten years, initiatives in that area should be considered. However, as has been <br />stated many times, such initiatives need to be approved by the Town's collective bargaining units in order <br />to be put into effect. The Town will probably need to consider any and all options as we approach <br />FY2010 and/or later fiscal years where expenses may exceed available revenues by millions of dollars. <br />We hope that the projections in the Appendix and this discussion will promote a multi -year view as each <br />of the specific financial articles is acted upon at this Town Meeting. <br />Page 11 of 50 <br />