Laserfiche WebLink
- 4- <br />Chairman Smith opened the meeting to comments. A synopsis of the major <br />concerns voiced follows: <br />I. SPECIAL NEEDS: <br />The Special Needs Committee has targeted a minimum of 44 families <br />in Lexington that have identified Housing needs as a priority for their <br />adult children, The Committee stated that independent housing for special <br />needs residents is a low priority for the Commonwealth's housing agencies, %WW <br />and thus needs to be addressed at the local level. <br />The Committee specifically mentioned a need for: <br />a: 2 Independent Living group homes, one for men and one <br />for women; in Lexington, <br />b: 24 hour staff for these homes, <br />c: Research conducted to locate sources of funding to <br />construct these homes <br />d: informing appropriate state agencies about Lexington's <br />special needs housing study <br />The Lexington Housing Authority (LHA) voiced the need to have rental units <br />for special needs residents, and advocated the inclusion of a requirement <br />setting aside # of units for special needs housing in developments. <br />11. CHAPTER 689 HOUSING: <br />LHA seeks 2 plots of land on which to build Chapter 689 houses in <br />Lexington. These buildings could house a number of rental or owner <br />occupied units for special needs residents, who could take pride in their <br />ownership or occupancy in independent living space. LHA noted that a <br />Ch.689 house needs space enough for a single family home. Chapter 689 %moo <br />housing fulfills a regional need. <br />III. LEXINGTON HOUSING PARTNERSHIP STATUS: <br />Selectmen Marshall reported on the status of the Town's application to the <br />State for membership in the Massachusetts Housing Partnership, which would <br />make the town eligible for grants and loans to both review large projects <br />proposed in Lexington, and provide developers with incentives to build <br />types of housing that Lexington wants and needs. The Town's application <br />is pending, and a decision is due before the end of the year. Our <br />proposal was controversial because it did not include the creation of a <br />new housing committee to oversee the partnership's activities. <br />Last year, a consultant, ABT Associates conducted a report on Equity <br />Sharing possibilites in Lexington. Equity sharing would use either or <br />both public and private funds to purchase housing units that the owner <br />would by on loan, to be paid back over time. <br />The preliminary assessment by ABT was that this would not be possible in <br />Lexington, but that another meeting was needed to determine whether to <br />take this concept any further. <br />