Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF DECEMBER 15, 2004 <br />A regular meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in the Guard Room, Police Station, was called to <br />order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Kastorf with members Davies, Galaitsis, Harden, Manz and planning staff <br />McCall- Taylor and Tap present. <br />MINUTES <br />Review of Minutes The Board reviewed the minutes for the executive sessions of December 17, 2003, <br />July 28, September 21, and November 3, 2004. On a motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to <br />approve the minutes as written. <br />ARTICLES FOR 2005 TOWN MEETING * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** <br />Rezone 1720 Massachusetts Avenue Battle Green Inn CB to CD: The proponents of the proposed <br />rezoning of 1720 Massachusetts Avenue were present to show the Board revised plans. The development <br />team has shown the proposal to other boards, committees and resident groups in recent weeks and the <br />current iteration reflects changes made in response to their comments. <br />Mr. Eric Shapiro described the differences in the proposal since the development team appeared before <br />the Planning Board on December 1. They had to do with the: <br />• Parking spaces: By changing the foundation on the Vine Brook Road side, three more spaces <br />could be created. However, the existing trees along the property line would be killed. <br />• Sizes of residential units: A wider range of sizes make them attainable by a greater variety of <br />income groups. <br />• Affordable units: Three units affordable to a moderate- income family would be included. <br />• Facade treatments: The proposed facades would be more harmonious with the existing <br />streetscape. <br />Design of the tower element: The tower element character would echo that of the adjacent <br />building section. <br />The Board remarked on the improvement in presentation materials, especially relative to the perceived <br />height of the structure. Suggestions included: <br />• On the side facing Vine Brook Road, interweave the ground -level terraces with existing mature <br />trees so that the trees might be saved; <br />• That same side of the building needs to be stepped back or otherwise reduced in height — <br />eliminating one story would be desirable— to alleviate its visual impact on abutters and to reduce <br />other impacts, such as traffic. <br />• The fourth floor would not be seen from most street -level standpoints. <br />• The team should refer to AvalonBay's methodology relative to the potential number of school -age <br />children, as town meeting members are familiar with it. <br />• Traffic would be a major issue, especially during demolition and construction. Demonstrate how <br />this would be alleviated. <br />There were a number of comments from the audience of eighteen people. <br />Mr. Eric Zanin, 72 Waltham Street - A new benchmark of impacts would be set by this project. A 3 -D <br />model is needed to clearly illustrate the new building's size and appearance. <br />Mr. Gerald Guttell, 16 Vine Brook - Vine Brook residents would not miss the current building, but please <br />step back the proposed third story and put in more plantings. <br />Mr. Karsten Sorensen, I Vine Brook - The developer should be bound by the same rules residents must <br />abide by and not allowed to exceed zoning provisions. <br />Mr. Julian Bussgang, 2 Forest Street - Development data should be presented in two easily compared <br />columns of figures - existing and proposed. <br />