2004-05-03-PB-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Minutes for the Meeting of May 3, 2004 2 secondarily, should the reduction in units pass, no one would know if the project were revenue neutral or what level of mitigations would be provided. Mr. Harden said that maybe the core argument against the amendment is that it should not even be considered because if Town Meeting should approves it, it is something that cannot go forward; the amendment without the consent of the developer does not make sense. Mr. Davies agreed and said that the amendment is not backed up by a plan. Mr. Gataitsis added that no one is proposing to build a 331 -unit development. Ms. Manz felt that people need to understand that they cannot have the rest of the package, including mitigations, if they vote for 331 units. Mr. Galaitsis said if one considers the entire site, the ratio of units per acre is consistent with the rest of the town. Mr. Kastorf made a motion to recommend disapproval of the Heinrich amendment because: 1) the amendment proposes no plan that canbe evaluated; and, 2) the number of units proposed does not provide 40B protection for the length of time that the 387 units would provide. Ms. Manz seconded the motion and the Board vote 5 to 0 in favor of the motion. On a motion duly made and seconded, the Board voted unanim 0