Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes for the Meeting of January 14, 2004 <br />impervious surface was preexisting and the developer was proposing removal of it but still could not <br />meet, after removal, the impervious surface ratio. The feeling was that if developers are malting an <br />attempt to move toward a more 'greenfields', undeveloped condition, that should be acknowledged and the <br />developer should be given some slack in terms of slightly exceeding the ISR, provided, however, that the <br />overall site coverage for the entire parcel still represents a net reduction. <br />There was further discussion of a possibly more aggressive provision about preexisting impervious <br />surface in terms of whether in some instances applicants shod be encouraged to retain impervious <br />surface for good, public benefit reasons, such as retention of historic buildings, avoidance of a road right- <br />of-way through a wetland or environmentally sensitive area or reuse of a site for affordable housing. In <br />the end, the Board asked the staff to redraft this provision addressing redevelopment of a site to more <br />clearly state its intent. <br />***** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** REPORTS ****** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** <br />LIAJSON REPORTS <br />Center Committee Mr. Kastorf reported that the Lexington Center Committee intends to submit a parking <br />amendment for the central business district. This amendment would essentially place parking for <br />individual properties into the discretionary special permit granting authority of the Board of Appeals, in <br />terms of waiving or reducing the parking requirement in the Zoning Bylaw. There was extensive <br />discussion by the Board and Mr. Garber handed out his critique of the draft amendment that had been <br />received through Mr. Kastorfs efforts earlier in the day and Mr. Garber pointed out a number of <br />deficiencies starting with the concept itself, that it could be a short term fix that would potentially worsen <br />the problem and create issues of equitable granting of relief to the Bylaw for downtown businesses. He <br />also mentioned the lack of clarity within the list of possible public benefits and the absence of a common <br />value basis for requiring them. He also pointed out that some of that list did not involve public benefits at <br />all but really just involved improvements that would be special permit conditions and should be provided <br />by anyone as part of downtown parking for basic function and safety. <br />It was agreed that Mr. Kastorf would attend the Lexington Center Committee meeting the following <br />morning and urge them to communicate with the Planning Board on this and perhaps, if the group was not <br />ready to go with a fully realized bylaw and article, suggest they should consider deferring to a future date. <br />* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** BOARD ORGANIZATION AND SCHEDULE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** <br />Meeting Schedule Ms. McCall- Taylor reiterated the January and February schedule of Planning Board <br />meetings every week for certain regulatory items such as Luongo Farm Lane and Clelland Road definitive <br />plans and the pending Hazel Road preliminary plan. She also listed out some proposed hearing dates of <br />the major rezoning articles for the 2004 Annual Town Meeting. <br />Pass - through Plan Review Mr. Garber explained the pending changes to the engineering review of plans <br />for the Planning Board and the Conservation Commission in particular. Due to staff reductions and <br />transfer of personnel, the Engineering Division will not be able to provide plan review services in terms <br />of storm water management and has requested that the Planning Board require a pass though fee <br />arrangement to bring in outside consultants to perform the function of reviewing stormwater plans. <br />Similarly, engineering has indicated that they can no longer not charge for site inspections. They intend to <br />farm out these services to an outside consultant. Staff explained that they would send communications to <br />the development community and invite them to a meeting if they want to speak on this issue. Tentatively, <br />it is scheduled February 1 1`" <br />