Laserfiche WebLink
Breadcrumb Navigation:
IWZ <br />p <br />Lt T orrode ■ L F.D. reported that of the responding industries► <br />y <br />onl 7 or 8 had shown leve 1 s of hazardous mater on site, sufficient <br />' ' 1 sis as ified by EPA, and outlined procedures <br />to require risk ana y PeC <br />followed to deal with various levels of concern. <br />chief Berg eron stated that the committee is now attempting to g et <br />d in future will work tow • <br />ng <br />local plans in place an toward coordination of with neighbori <br />lann' <br />P � for emergency situations and use of equi <br />tams r econded it was voted. to approve ► as a <br />Capon motion duly made , procedures set forth b y � e Haz ardou s <br />the po and y th <br />general concept, po <br />Substan Sys Review Ccmmi.ttee , with the understanding <br />that as need <br />fence dictate, they may be revised or moderated. <br />and experience Chief Berg . <br />D Ra' Environmental Scientist, was introduced by • <br />r� �� devel a computer program to aid the <br />Dr. Raj ' s y had worked to � e Federal <br />• in re din to requests for information by th <br />ca�ttttee span g <br />of Berg eron accepted the discs, on behalf of the <br />committee <br />and thanked Dr. Raj for his valuable contribution as a mmber <br />' <br />noted that citizen involvement as shown in <br />of the ca mittee . Mrs. Smith <br />' its work contributes in large measure to the greatness <br />the committ i <br />of Lexington as a town. <br />MINUT MAN NATIONAL HISTORIC PARK G.M. DRAFT PLAN <br />Pam Mr. Edds <br />• son referred t o the November 1 deadline by which to respond <br />1 Manag ement Plans for the riinute Man Park and <br />to the Draft Genera g o attempt to develop a <br />suggested a meeting with the Planning Board tp <br />• Park Service on the pans, <br />unified response to the l <br />Mr. Eddison had reviewed the October 13 draft position statement of <br />• e draft plan and referenced several items in the <br />the Planning Board on the P n. He reported <br />s <br />tatemeent which he felt should be revised or expanded u po <br />that Haywar Pond Assoc. had expressed its di sccmf ort with the Pl anning <br />Board's response on the matter of volunteer or friendly acquisition of <br />residential land <br />' referred to interface with the Hayward Pond neighbors <br />Mrs. Smith <br />� n to land taking by the Park Service. She felt <br />and the Board's opposltio should b continued. <br />that the Tam's e f forts to oppose any takings s �� it <br />1 questioned the takeover of the Battle Road to <br />Mr. Mar l qu , <br />sha <br />t f rern a modern road convert i d to its Original l state and whether it might <br />be better to disagree with the general concept now. <br />' ' n the li ht of his work to date with the Park <br />Mr r Edc1.i son ■ 1 g <br />Service, felt that an <br />attractive and mutually rewarding historical area <br />could be recreated in the Park • lst <br />The matter will be further discussed prior to the Nov <br />deadline. <br />GRACE CHAPEWOLD BELFREY LOT PROPOSAL d <br />t representing Grace C hapel, P �! hapel■ was present for d <br />Geo Ken ■ � <br />of plans for construction of an educat io n/ recreation center at Forest <br />� <br />and Muzz Streets, as proposed by the church. <br />� to make a <br />Kent stated that he was not prepared that evening <br />K ass rep <br />Mr. be lad to L� <br />formal presentation of plans but would g ive a proof g g <br />to modi the plans to on steps taken y r suggestions by area <br />that week. <br />residents,* leted durin New plans were expected to be c g <br />