Laserfiche WebLink
-4-- <br />Regarding future individual requests, as mentioned by L.'r. Hays, he <br />saw the possibility of defects, such as asbestos, being discovered, and <br />which are not covered in the proposal. <br />William Sullivan, Vice Chairman of the Trustees, voiced opposition <br />to retaining the resale cap which he`felt denied owners the flexibility <br />to deal with the needed repairs on their own. He felt that the owners <br />had been placed in an unfair situation, that the building had many <br />serious problems throughout and was not what the buyers had been led to <br />expect in a new development. He saw a worst scenario figure of <br />$1,500,000 for repairs. <br />Mr. Marshall pointed out that owners do have the option of selling <br />their units if they are unwilling or unable to share in the repair <br />costs. <br />Darryl Battin noted that financial impacts would vary depending on <br />the number of members in a family and that the option of moving would <br />not be possible for some who would have no place to go if they sell. <br />She felt that some owners may have bought elsewhere if the amount of the <br />additional assessment had been foreseen. <br />Kristin Sumner said she had known about the 4% cap when she <br />purchased her unit and realized that it cannot be lifted in the interest <br />of keeping Muzzey affordable. She supported the LexHAB proposal but was <br />concerned about interest charges which are not included as recoverable. <br />Mr. Marshall referred to the experience with sale and resale <br />procedures for the Hancock School condo units on which there had been no <br />resale price cap and which very quickly escalated in price, removing <br />them from the "affordable" range. He said that the Town is committed to <br />•r <br />keeping Muzzey affordable and retaining the resale price cap. <br />Mr. Hays suggested and addition to the proposal in view of the fact <br />that costs involved for some items are still unknown or not firm. He <br />asked that the phrase "subject to the approval of LexHAB or the Board of <br />Selectmen" be added to items I -A and I -C through I -F. <br />Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve <br />adjustment of the resale price formula for Muzzey condominium units as <br />proposed by the Lexington Housing Assistance Board, and as amended by <br />Mr. Hays. <br />Mr. Hays agreed, in response to a question from the Board, that in <br />most cases, adjustments for defects peculiar to individual units would <br />be addressed by LexHAB. <br />Mrs. Smith observed that the need for future discussions on Muzzey <br />problems was obvious since that night's action by the Selectmen did not <br />solve all problems and concerns, and that further meetings would be <br />scheduled. <br />She asked that unit owners remember that LexHAB and the Selectmen <br />will continue to work as a team and give their best efforts to resolving <br />the concerns of the residents. <br />Mrs. Smith thanked LexHAB members for their untiring efforts <br />through the years to fulfill their responsibilities regarding Muzzey and <br />address problems which have developed there. <br />Mr. Marshall saw the Board's action as a first step in that <br />direction, <br />In individual cases where the financial structure of the assessment <br />would impose hardship, he felt that assistance would be available, <br />however, he saw the possible requirement for asset tests, which had not <br />been included at the time of original purchase. <br />