Laserfiche WebLink
� L <br />1� <br />SEUCITM S MEETING <br />ti <br />e� <br />March 2$ 1988 <br />4 <br />A regular meeting of the Boa of Selectmen was held on Monday, <br />March 28 19 � � � <br />S 8 , in the Selectmen's Meeting Roam. Town Office Btmlding, <br />at 7:00 p.m. Chairman Eddison, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Dailey, Mrs. Smith, <br />Mr., McSweeney; Mr. White, Town Manager; Mr. Cohen. Town Counse Mrs, <br />Snow. Executive Clerk were present. <br />OF TREES. PROSPECT HILL ROAD <br />err ■i i.�i.miri�r. rimer •r.ni.i.i� ^rrq� <br />The Board reviewed the report of the Tree Warden on the Public <br />Hearing on March 15. on the proposal to remove twelve trees at 72 <br />Prospect Hill Road, necessary in order to construct a sidewalk and stone <br />wall. Francis Fields, Town Engineer and Peter Chalpin, Asst, Town <br />Engineeer were present. <br />Mr. Chalpin referred to three of the twelve trees on the p <br />of Hamid Keramaty, and the request of Mr. Keramaty that these trees be <br />retained. Mr. Mazerall, Tree Warden, had felt that two of these trees <br />would probably suffer root damage f ram the excavation for a retai <br />wall, but would do his best to save them if so directed. After the <br />excavation he would inspect the trees for damage and if, in his <br />opinion, they would represent a hazard in time to came, would remove <br />them, <br />�■•• Mr. Keramaty agreed with this procedure and asked if a third tree, <br />could be included. Mr. Chalpin reported that the tree has Dutch Elm <br />disease., and should cue down, It would be replaced by a shrub. Mr, <br />Keramaty asked that the Elm tree be left s g and said he would be <br />responsible for its removal if it eventually dies. Mrs. Smith suggested <br />that the tree be treated by injections and cutting back. <br />R Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve the <br />removal of nine of the trees on the property of Hamid Keramaty and Cathy <br />Collins, 72 Prospect Hill Road. Two oak trees will be left in place <br />until after the excavation for the construction of a retaining wall. If <br />it appears that these trees have suffered extensive root damage and will <br />not survive, they will be removed at the discretion of the Tree Warden. <br />Mr. Keramaty will assume responsibility for the treatment and. if <br />necessary, the disposition of an oak tree on his property. <br />Mr. Chalpin said that only the elm tree would be replaced by <br />shrubbery in response to Mr. Keramaty's request for additional shrubs. <br />Mr. Marshall advised that this be kept open if the property looks too <br />barren after the tree removal . <br />Mr. Keramaty said he had planned to build a fence for safety to his <br />children since he would be losing the use of three feet of his front <br />pro and felt that the Town should award him damages. Mr. White <br />noted that Mr. Keramaty has three years in which to appeal the Town's <br />decision that no damages are warranted. <br />EXTRA W01RK OMER ■ E ROOFING <br />Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve Extra <br />Work order #1, Contract 88 -13 with Professional Roofing, in the amount <br />of $4.000.00, with a revised contract amount of $35,899.00. <br />