Laserfiche WebLink
Y i . . <br />r <br />:1 <br />SELECTMEN'S MEETING <br />January 11, 1988 <br />A regular meeting of the Board of Selectmen was held on Monday, <br />January 11, 1989, in the Selectmen's Meeting Room, Town Office <br />Building, at 7:30 p.m. Chairman Eddison, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Dailey, <br />Mrs. Smith, Mr. McSweeney; Mr. White, Town Manager; Mr. Cohen, Town <br />Counsel; Mrs. Snow, Executive Clerk, were prese -nt. <br />BEDFORD STREET ROAD PROJECT <br />Mr. White referred to a December 15th meeting with DPW <br />Commissioner Tierney on the Bedford Street Road Improvement project and <br />the Commissioner's proposal that the work be divided into two phases in <br />order that the improvements to the Hartwell avenue area'not be held up <br />by the unresolved design for the easterly end of the project. <br />A written report on the phasing proposal, prepared by Mr. Cook of <br />the BSC Croup, was reviewed. Mr. Cook painted out positive and negative <br />aspects of the split - project plan adding that in addition to the major <br />issues listed, other factors may come to light if the plan were to be <br />implemented. <br />Mr. White recommended response to the State DPW as soon as <br />possible and saw the plan with too many negatives to be acceptable. He <br />felt that the DPW should be informed that Lexington would want the <br />whole package, including access and lights at'Eldred Street, or <br />nothing. <br />Mr. Eddison agreed with the need for quick response but felt it <br />desirable that the plan be reviewed by the North Lexington Road <br />Improvement Study Committee before final decision is made. He also <br />noted his tentative appointment with James Walsh, Division <br />Administrator, Federal Highway Administration for this area, for <br />discussion of the matter and felt that input from these two sources <br />would be helpful before preparing an answer to the State. <br />AUTOMATIC AMUSEMENT DEVICE RULESIRECS, <br />Mr. White asked for comments and suggestions on his draft Rules <br />and Regulations for the Licensing of Automatic Amusement Devices, <br />prepared at the request of the Board. He noted that the rules would <br />provide the Board with considerable flexibility when considering <br />approval of applications. The regulations had been adapted from those <br />adopted by Winchester. <br />All members were in agreement with Mr. Dailey's suggestion that <br />the legal. i ty of limiting video machines to use by non-profit <br />organizations should be explored. Mr. Cohen will report to the Board <br />on the matter. <br />PROSPECT HILL ROAD VOTE OF INTENT <br />Mr. White referred to a plan showing a permanent easement and <br />temporary construction easements required for the Prospect Hill Road <br />sidewalk proect and asked the Board to vote its intent to tame these <br />-- easements, He noted that no betterments had been assessed and that no <br />damages are warranted. Areas of construction were pointed out by Mr. <br />Fields, Town Engineer. <br />