Laserfiche WebLink
Selectmen s Meeting -5- January 25 1988 <br />MWRA ISSUES <br />Mrs. Smith referred to her memo to the Board and Man acier in which <br />she raised two issues which had been discussed at a January 21st MWRA- <br />Advisory Board meeting, and which would impact Lexington, over time. <br />Mrs. Smith reported that the MWRA Board of Directors is now <br />considering inclusion of full service towns such as Lexington in the <br />Policy for Continuation of Water Supply, rather than covering onl :_ <br />contract communities, as or i gi nal lV proposed. She was opposed to this <br />action, noting that the full service communities had had no opportunity <br />for input o n the formation of the policy, <br />The second issue involved MWRA billing procedures which may be <br />changed from semi - annuallV to quarterly billing to help mieet MWRA cash <br />flow problems. Mrs. Smith pointed out the resultant loss to the To;f,In <br />of interest, under this system, and recommended consideration of <br />quarterly water/sewer billing of Lexington residents. <br />Mrs. Smith had prepared a draft letter t o be sent t o+ Pau 1 � ev y , <br />MWRA Executive Director, asking that the MWRA Board of Directors not <br />vote to include in the Policy full service communities which had not <br />participated in its formulation. The letter also requested that the <br />Authority f ollot,,+ a strict policy of never voting to impose policies or <br />rules and regulations affecting specific communities without firs t <br />including them in the debate during the formation of such initiatives. <br />The Board agreed to authorize Mr. Edd i so; n to send the letter, as <br />prepared, on the Board's behalf . <br />P� FY89 BUDGET OVERVIEW <br />Mr, White reviewed his message on the Proposed Budget for FY89 <br />with the Board. Among items h, i ghl i gh t ed were an amount of $54;1325497, <br />for total operation and maintenance of Town government including <br />schools and a -year capital imprc..rvements program. Total :�ece:pts of <br />.& i 1?3 735 and an estimated tax i e vl of $3 ,3 .0,er were noted. f-4 r., <br />estimated residential tax of $10.13 (a 3 . Yl increase) and commercial <br />rate of $17.33 were anticipated to support the budget, <br />The Manager noted that budgets have been reduced in order t o <br />accommodate current financial limitations, but will remain consi stern t <br />with the Board f s goal for maintenance of essential services with a <br />stable tax rate. In addition to budget reductions, additional revenues <br />will have to be used to attain a balanced budget and stay within the <br />limits of Proposition t 1 r/3. Without the use of additional revenues <br />Mr. White added, service reductions would be necessary. , <br />He referred to the unresolved issue of the school budget, which <br />exceeds the 6 by 3.58% <br />There was brief discussion of water and sewer enterprise funds <br />which will be discussed further a t a subsequent meeting. <br />The Manager's proposed budget recommended a cautious allocation of <br />"Free Cash" which he said is at a higher than usual level. <br />Major spending variables which constitute the largest portion of <br />the FY89 increase were listed as Town Payroll; Enterprise Accounting - <br />MWRA; Health Insurance; Refuse Collection ; Debt Service; and Capital <br />Improvements and Operational Articles. <br />