Laserfiche WebLink
M <br />RESERVE FUND TRANSFERS <br />Mr. Hu tchinson reported that a request for transf from the Reserve <br />Fund for work on the Bridge School may not be necessary and asked that the <br />item be deferred. He is working with the insurance company on reimbursement <br />procedures. <br />CONTRACT CLEANING AND LINING EX I ST I MG WATER MAIMS <br />Upon motion du made and seconded, it was voted t o execute Contract <br />#86-5 -E Cleaning & Lining Existing Water Mains, with Si szko Contracting <br />Corp., 20 Development St., Fal. l River in the amount of $174,750.00 as <br />approved on April 28, 1986. <br />SCHOOL RENOVATION PROGRAM ARTICLE 35 <br />Mr. Hutchinson presented material summarizing the impact of a <br />$10,070,000 bond issue for the School Renovation Project and Land <br />Acquisition, for terms of 10 15 and 20 years, as requested by the Board in <br />addition to the data on a $12,220 funding prey i ously distributed. This <br />reflected in general Mr. Da i 1 ey' s su gSes t i o n as apposed to the full program <br />proposed by the School Committee. <br />Mr. Marshall asked for discussion as to what level of spending the <br />Board was ready to support. <br />Mr. McSweeney said, in the light of letters from Bridge School parents, <br />that he would propose an O p t i o n SA which would i r: �:lude all safety code <br />related items, plus roof work, handicapped accessibility projects, removal <br />of asbestos and replacement of Lexan with glass. He felt other items could <br />be deferred, such as energy conservation measures, the educational program <br />and i n t e r i o r and exterior carpeting. He estimated that funding of <br />$5,000,000 would be needed for this option, <br />Mrs. Smith spoke in support of the full program, excluding the <br />Administration Building project, as proposed by the School Committee in <br />order to maintain quality of education. <br />Mr. Dailey was in favor of a $10,000,000 progrmri, which would provide <br />for on-going maintenance by two permanent 2-man crews to avoid the need for <br />such extensive repairs at one time in future years. <br />Discussion followed on the pros and cons of an increased maintenance <br />staff to accomplish the needed improvements vs, con tract i ng the work out. <br />Mr. Clough stated that effort has been consistently made to keep the schools <br />in good condition. <br />Regarding the issue of spr i nkler i ng the schools, at a total cast of <br />$1,000,000, Mr. McSweeney requested the recommendations of the Fire Chief <br />and the Town Manager on the safety aspect. Mr. Hutchinson responded t ha t <br />the proposed smoke detector system is geared to the safety of individuals, <br />He added that the Chief would not recommend against sp r i n k l er i n g , but that <br />smoke detector installation is supported by all. <br />Mr. Eddi son expressed his support of the total $12 million package, but <br />felt that the School Administration Building was not of high enough priority <br />to be included. <br />