|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2009-03-18-AC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Appropriation Committee-AC
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
2009-03-18-AC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2022 3:26:53 PM
Creation date
2/26/2010 4:50:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
2009
Department
Town Clerk
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - AC - Appropriation Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
29: based on current information it will be IN (pending) <br />30: pending <br />31: pending (will be IN). This project w /drawn at request of Pat Goddard because falling price of oil <br />meant it was no longer cost - effective. It will be substituted with project to relocate /add sprinkler heads <br />at Clarke School (Brown Book, p. XI -II). This new project will be included in the Warrant for the May 6 <br />STM. <br />43: 0- 8- 1(JB); Mike recommends against this article for many reasons. He will propose a different <br />resolution under the healthcare line item in Article 4. <br />Discussion about how to prepare the financial projections: <br />If recession ends FY11, won't see increase in state aid until FY12. There's a one -year lag between state <br />aid and the recession — either way. How do we decide on which growth numbers to use for healthcare <br />expenses, state aid, etc? Alan proposes using numbers that are more optimistic than what Eric is <br />hearing from town staff. <br />AI's suggestion: look at Rob's projection from the fall and write a narrative with a sensitivity analysis on <br />wages and other items. <br />Mike disagrees — he feels we're the AC, we should be telling TM what we think is the financial future of <br />the town. <br />JB —The policy question for next year will be whether to use money from the stabilization fund or <br />recommend an override. <br />AL —The error caused by going over budget is greater than being under budget. When building a budget <br />it's important to underestimate revenues and over estimate expenses. Can't do projections that way <br />though. <br />11: a) pending, c) Pine Meadows — where should the funding come from — CPA or Recreation Enterprise <br />Fund? 3 -6 <br />Future meeting schedule: <br />Tuesday, March 24: 8:00 PM, Final discussion on drafts <br />Meeting Adjourned: 10:45 PM <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Pam Hoffman <br />Approved July 6, 2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.