1984-10-BOS-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Selectmen's Meeting � ��j -3- October 1, 1984 and felt that offering of the Playboy channel constituted a breach of con- tract. He added that the matter had not been broached to ' the Board by Adams/ Russell, but that Mr. Pollack had. talked to the Cable Comm.itt ee and had offered scrambling devices upon request by, cus t.omer s . It had been thought by some that putting the burden of requesting on the customer was inappropriate. Mr. Ward added that the Committee did have conversation with Adams /Russell on the addition of the channel, which the company prflposed . to do in response to public interest. The Committee had considered that basically, since the programming was considered to be rated "R" not ' there was no control in - the mat ter, Mr. Page agreed with Mr. Ward's assessment,, and referred to Mr. Henchey' s assurance to the Board at the time of licensing that Adams /Russell's intent was to exercise good judgment and taste in selections of programming. He said that the Committee had been told by Adams /Russell that Cinemax and HBA showin s also _ -. rated "W', could be considered to be more offensive than Playboy. He. added that the Committee had never been asked by Adams /Russell ' f or its approval of the programming. Mr., Ward reported that about 60% of converters shipped to Adams/Russell scramble both sound and picture of the channel, and that 40% allow transmission of the sound track. Mr. Pollack said he felt the showing of the Playboy channel did not repre- sent a departure f rom the terms of the contract, and of f erect to have Mrs . Baker representing the Playboy Channel appear to answer any questions the Board may have. He said that the Torn of Bedford had seen no problem with. the Channel and that both Bedford and Hanscom Field-customers had requested ehe addition. He had attempted, through contact with the CATV Committee, to out if there would be Lexington opposition before proceeding with arrangements . It had been his intent to make the channel available upon request , but not to advertise or bring attention to its availability.' There has been no attempt to market the channel, but it is offered on a one -to -one basis when subscribers are enquiring about other options. Mr. Sacco suggested that offering the playboy channel to a prospective customer for the Disney Channel, as had been reported to him, seemed less than appropriate.' ppropriate . ' He asked if the Committee has seen the Playboy channel and was t old 'b y Mr. Ward that he had not. Mr. McLaughlin, liaison to the CATV Committee,: recalled that at his first meeting with the committee, the matter had been brought up that the committee could have gotten the impression that - the' Board did not wish to become involved in such decisions. Mr . ward said he now realized that the committee shou have informed the Board of the issue, and will do so in any future instances. Mr. Pollack told the Board he would plan to notify customers, by means of a notice to be included with their bills, that the converter can be installed upon their request. This could be done with or without reference to the Play- boy channel in the f lyer, . Mr. Marshall said he would prefer specific mention of the Playboy Channel . in the notice. with reference to commitments' made on types of programming to be shown, he felt that Adams/Russell had misrepresented facts and had lied to the Board on this issue. He said that this action has created a long term pro- blem and will have an impact on the future relationship between the company '� and the Board,