Laserfiche WebLink
} -3- <br />Mr. Eddison reported on the October -26th, 2.7th, 28th Massa- <br />chusetts Municipal Meeting in Hyannis; which he, Mrs. Battin and <br />Mr. Hutchinson had attended, noting several issues which had been <br />addressed; such as: Hazardous waste, Prison Siting and others. <br />The major issue considered had been Binding Arbitration Legis- <br />lation. He reported that, in essence, the MMA will resist any <br />closure mechanism; but if proposed, will proceed within the guide- <br />lines recommended by the MMA Executive Committee on . C losure/Labor <br />Relations. <br />Mr. McLaughlin outlined his proposal for a strategic planning <br />process regarding "Lexington 2,000". <br />He gave examples of past decisions which could be considered <br />examples of "avoidable mistakes", and requested members to submit <br />any others they recalled. He felt that if there had been signi- <br />ficant numbers of "avoidable mistakes" attempt could be made to ad- <br />dress mechanisms which may reduce their number in the future. <br />Another area to be addressed would be -pushing- out horizons. <br />He recommended that a determination be made as to whether the <br />strategic planning process should be pursued; anal, if so, he re- <br />quested suggestions on any changes to his proposal. <br />MMA <br />Annual <br />Meeting <br />"Lexington <br />2 <br />Regarding areas of problems to be addressed, he suggested that - <br />as a starting point, the three major Boards, plus the Housing Author- <br />ity should be asked to individually discuss. strategic objectives of <br />Ou■► the next 10 to 15 years to identify topic areas and list their priorities. <br />Mr. Marshall recommended collection of data and information on what <br />is currently happening in Town in order to accomplish problem identifi- <br />cation. Mr. Eddison agreed that data gathering was important noting , <br />that this was an ongoing process in the Planning Department. He hoped, <br />other agencies would cooperate in this effort . He felt that a 5 to 6 <br />year rotational planning system which could be revised , . if needed, from <br />time to time, was preferable. He was in favor of a shorter time horizon. <br />Mr. McLaughlin was not in favor of the 5 -year plan concept which he felt <br />would tend to be non-strategic. He would see as a first step the de- <br />velopment of a matrix by Town Agencies and Staff. Mr. Hutchinson noted <br />the work load of Town Agencies and Staff with respect to support for <br />Committees, and recommended that temporary outside help in the development <br />of - a report* <br />While it was generally agreed that this planning process may even - <br />tau l ly require formation of a Committee, it was thought that the first <br />step identification of long -term issues was a= good starting point. <br />The Board concurred with Mr. McLaughlin' s recommendation that is- <br />sues should be surfaced by the Selectmen, Planning Board, School Committee <br />and Lexington Housing Authority before designing of a process and to defer <br />formation of .a Committee until that has been accomplished. Mr. McLaughlin <br />will draft a letter for distribution t o the above - mentioned major Boards <br />requesting a one -page response, outlining primary concerns and potential <br />problems Mrs. Battin will confer with the Chairmen of those Boards <br />prior to a meeting to be scheduled for discussion of "Lexington, 2000". <br />