Laserfiche WebLink
Art. 24 Mrs. Battin noted that the Planning Board has .now taken a position in <br />Hayden Ave. support of Article 24, citizens proposal for rezoning of land at Hayden <br />to CD Avenue from RC to CD Zone. She asked f f the Board wished to take a position <br />on Article 24 at this time. <br />Mr. Edd ison voiced his favorable position and moved that the Board <br />support the proposal. <br />The motion was seconded for purposes of debate, <br />Mr. Sacco and kr: McLaughlin indicated that they wished to hear more <br />discussion of the matter before discussion. <br />Mrs. Battin expressed her support. <br />Mr. Marshall stated that he opposed Article 24. <br />The motion did not carry. <br />Sen.Kraus Senator Kraus was in attendance for further discussion of his proposed <br />Prop Two tax ref orm proposal, which will be acted upon by the Senate as Bill 1709, <br />in the near future. He requested Town Meeting adoption of a Resolution <br />in Support of Proposition Two, which he said would be important in terms <br />of what happens on the f loor on the Senate, <br />Chairman Smith of 'the Planning Board, Chairman Hamburger and Margaret <br />Rawls of the TMMA, Chairman McCabe and Jacquelyn Ward of the Capital <br />Expenditures Committee and Chairman Dailey and Michael O'Sullivan of the <br />Appropriations Committee were present for the discussion. <br />Following discussion of procedures under Prop. 2 1/2, a question and <br />answer period concerning implications of annual reassessment of property <br />and other aspects of the Senator's proposal Mrs. Battin asked whether <br />the Board felt in a position to decide on support of the resolution and <br />presentation to Town Meeting under Article 2. <br />Mr. McLaughlin said he would prefer not to act on the resolution <br />at this point. He had requested information from the Manager regarding <br />what the present projections are for conditions at the end of this fiscal <br />year and when we might be reaching 2%. He also wanted to research the rate <br />of increases from year to year prior to Prop 2 1/2 and felt. that kind of <br />information should be looked at before making a decision. <br />Mr. Marshall, who will not be present on-May 9, said he was ready to <br />support the Resolution and the bill and would like to see Town Meeting <br />debate the issue. <br />Mr. Sacco saw no need to override Proposition 2 1/2 at this time, <br />since he felt it was doing its job in Lexington. He would not support <br />the resolution. <br />Mr. Eddison said he was in support of the proposal, and hoped that as <br />many of the Selectmen as possible would also support. On that basis, he <br />said he was willing to wait for the provision of information mentioned by <br />Mr. McLaughlin to enable him to come to a decision. <br />Mrs. Battin said she was in support of the proposal. <br />Mr. McLaughlin said he was willing to support the concept of bringing <br />the resolution to the Town Meeting floor, even though he was not willing to <br />endorse , it at this time, with an indication that the Board wishes to have <br />further discussion on the issue at a subsequent Selectmen's meeting. <br />Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to provide inf or-- <br />mati.on to Town Meeting on Senator Kraus' :s proposal at the-May 9th session, <br />with an indication that the Board's intent is to have the matter brought <br />up for Town Meeting debate, following the Selectmen's decision on its <br />position. <br />woo <br />wow <br />