Laserfiche WebLink
-z- <br />What is the cost of ten year vs. five ear financing? The Town <br />Manager reviewed with those present a debt service schedule developed by <br />him showing the financial impact and implications for each bonding period. <br />Both . 5 - and 10 -year bonding would impose $350,000 on the '84 tax levy, <br />with payments of $550, 000 /year for the five year bonding and $350,000 /year' <br />for ten years. <br />Does this compromise commitment to affordable housin ? Mr, Smith <br />said he felt that it was not an option since the . owners would be unwilling to <br />sell the land for such use and unless rezoning was asked, the Town would have <br />no leverage to require any moderate income housing. <br />What are the s ec if is rights of the Golf Course. owners? Mr. Smith noted <br />that agreements are still being drawn up under which the owners would continue <br />the use as a golf course under a 50 -year lease arrangement, with payment <br />of rent in lieu of taxes of $8,000/year. After the expiration. of the 50- <br />year lease, the owners are requesting right of first refusal. The owners <br />would also have the option within 10 years for expansion of the 9 -hole <br />course into 18 -holes on 6.2 acre contiguous parcel, with the approval of <br />the Selectmen, Planning Board and_ Conservation Commission. <br />What is the likelihood of reimbursement? Mr. Smith pointed out U.D.A.G., <br />as a po ss ible source of funding under the Urban Self Help Program. There <br />are State funds in the amount of $5,500,000 available and the Commission <br />will apply for reimbursement. He noted the Commission's history of success <br />in such efforts, but that the track record of the Town is always questioned <br />by the State. <br />Chairman . Clough, School Committee, expressed his real concerns regarding <br />the impact of financing the land purchase ' on school funding over the long <br />haul. He f orsees a crunch for the school system in 1988, as in other Towns <br />dealing with Prop. 2 1/2. It was noted that the School Committee had limited <br />control over use of the Meagherville site since it-had been taken for school ''' <br />and other Town purposes. <br />With regard to ' inancial impact on the school system, Mr. Smith pointed <br />out that there would be considerable impact if the land were developed <br />residentially, with an additional 200 or more students to be .:absorbed . <br />Regarding the financial picture, Mr. Hutchinson noted that the purchase <br />could be handled this year, but referred to its effects on economic growth <br />in 1986. <br />In answer to question on traffic generated on access roads of a golf <br />course vs. residential development of 120 houses, Mr. Price estimated a <br />60 - 65% increase in traffic for an 18 -hole course as opposed to a 9-hole <br />course. Mr. Bowyer, Planning Board, referred to a housing memo and the <br />projection for approximately 700 trips /day generated by an 18 -hole golf course <br />and 1,100 trips /day generated by a 120 house subdivision. <br />James Beek, School. Comm..;,;. also referred to the potential impact of the <br />purchase on the school system. He noted that Prop. 2 1/2 was intended to <br />cap government spending on day -to --day expenses and felt that funds for extra- <br />ordinary expendes should be raised in an extraordinary way and urged that <br />the Selectmen explore every option regarding financial arrangements. <br />Mr. Sacco compared the $780,000 income to the Town from residential <br />development with .the $8,000 payment in lieu of taxes proposed, and noted <br />that an actual project ion of costs for additional town services in conjunc- <br />tion with housing has not been made. <br />W <br />