Laserfiche WebLink
Selectmen's Meeting, January 9, 1984 <br />-3- <br />The Chairman opened the hearing on Norton Road, and noted the Planning Norton Road <br />Board "s position in opposition to its acceptance. The Planning Board did <br />not favor expenditure of money on the street since it does not meet criteria <br />for upgrading and felt that other streets are more worthy of upgrading. <br />Difficulties in laying out a turnaround at the end of the street were noted. <br />The Board, however, pointed out improved access to Great Meadows for fire <br />vehicles. <br />Mr. Fields showed a slide of the street and reported that it would be <br />paved at a width of. 24' for a distance of 280' . Sidewalk would be installed <br />on the northerly side, with no land takings involved.. Of the nine abuttors , <br />nine had signed the petition. The cost for the project would be $35,000, <br />with a betterment return of $13,919..22. Questionnaires returned showed five <br />abu tto rs in favor and one - opposed. There have been no previous petitions. <br />Mr. Politi noted that the Board had been initially contacted on two <br />issues regarding Norton Road: lack of snow plowing because of road conditions <br />and mail delivery problems. <br />Mr. Michelson advocated that if Norton Road is to be accepted, sidewalk <br />should be deleted as an economic factor. <br />In answer to Mr. Michelson's question about lack of turnaround at the <br />end of the dead end .street, Mr. Tona.s zuck responded that the Town tries to <br />avoid land takings. It was noted that turnaround would not be required on <br />Norton Street as it is in new developments-, <br />Mr. Politi pointed out that the mail delivery problems on Norton Road are <br />being explored with the Postal Authorities and that wet weather conditions <br />had precluded plowing in the last snow storm because damage would have been <br />done to the P lows . <br />No one else speaking in favor or in opposition, the Chairman declared the <br />F <br />hearing on Norton Road . closed . <br />The Chairman opened the hearing on Sunny Knoll Avenue and noted strong Sunny Knoll <br />Planning Board support of the project as a connector from Bedford Street to Avenue <br />Reed Street. Mr. Fields gave a slide presentation of the roadway and re- <br />ported that it would be constructed for a distance of 609' with a 40' layout <br />and 24' pavement. S id.ewalk would be installed on the southerly side, with <br />land takings only for roundings . Cost for construction is proj ec ted at <br />$91,000, with a betterment return of $17,875.38. Of the six questionnaires <br />returned, five were in favor and one opposed. Previou petitions have been <br />submitted in 1978, 1979, 1980 and 1982. <br />Question was raised concerning the undeveloped parcel on Sunny Knoll. <br />The Town Manager will report on the potential for creating more than one <br />buildable lot from this parcel. <br />Mrs. Nichols, Planning Board, stated that improvement to traffic circu- <br />lation in the area warrants the road improvement even though some of the <br />frontage land is undeveloped. <br />Mrs. ward, 15 Robinson Road, asked if the hazards and traffic impact at <br />the intersection. of Bedford and Reed Streets had been considered. Mr. Fields <br />responded that more weight had been given to favorable results regarding <br />circulation. <br />Mr. Angelo, 3 Sunny Knoll Avenue, asked if thought had been given to <br />correction of existing drainage problems on the road. Mr. Fields said that <br />E the road would be designed for positive drainage . <br />