Laserfiche WebLink
4 � <br />-6- <br />given specific guidelines as to what the Town wants so they can be respon- <br />sive when submitting proposals. <br />Mrs. Rawls reported on poll of members of the members of the TMMA Execu -- "k tive Committee to try . to gain a sense of the Town on the Senior Center issue. <br />She prepared a draft statement which was placed before the 13 member present !NW <br />at its September 9 meeting. <br />The Executive Committee members present were of the opinion that the <br />whole problem of a Senior Center should be resolved before the question of <br />whether to include it in- Muzzey plans is decided. They could think of no way <br />to accomplish this wio thout a special town meeting. <br />All agreed that since they have received no hard data on the Senior Cen- <br />ter, they are not convinced of the need. In reference to the 1978 commitment <br />to a Senior Center, it was not felt to be a commitment as to location, size <br />of program or scope of A further imbalance in the housing stock <br />with respect to elderly and other housing categories could result if emphasis <br />on construction of a Senior Center was given precedence for Muzzey. <br />Doubts were expressed by the Ececutive Committee that the Town Meeting <br />would approve funding for a Senior Center if it were included in plans for <br />Muzzey.. Three members felt strongly that it should be required with a "no <br />senior center" option, as required by the substitute motion, to allow the Town <br />Meeting to vote on the concept as well as a specific plan. The other ten agreed <br />that it should be an option rather than a requirement in Muzzey plans,-and <br />favored the statement. put before them by Mrs. Rawls, as follows: <br />"Studies have been conducted indicating the need for an enlarged Senior <br />Center to provide increased services and activities for an expanding Senior <br />population. The Council on Aging has expressed its satisfaction with a por- <br />tion of Muzzey School as .a - location for such a center. There has, however,, <br />been no town or Town Meeting consensus on preferred location,; breadth of pro - <br />fram, acceptance of increased costs, etc. <br />A senior Center maybe included in plans if developers think such a cen- <br />ter would enhance or be compatible with their proposed residential plans. A <br />layout acceptble to the Council on Aging for conversion of 8,000 square feet <br />of the ground level of the school already exists, and may be made available to <br />developers who request it. Because the Town Meeting has expressed a wish to <br />vote on any Senior Center as a separate item, if one is proposed, it must be <br />presented as an option; and an alternate plan must also be prepared showing the <br />proposed development without such a center. In such a case, both plans would <br />be presented to the Town Meeting. <br />The inclusion of a. Senior Center is not to be a deciding f actor in j udg- <br />ing proposals. Rather, a developer's responsiveness to the housing priorities <br />set forth in the Planning Board Report will take precedence, <br />To cover the possibility of there being no Senior Center in the preferred <br />plan, or the Town Meeting s turning down one that in included, the Selectmen <br />have agreed to present to the same Town Meeting an article authorizing and fund - <br />ing a committee to explore other possible sites, and funding, program and build- <br />ing renovation needs - said committee to to the 1984 Town Meeting a <br />specific package for a Senior Center, and possibly for related Senior Service." <br />There was doubt expressed that the last paragraph is necessary, in view <br />of the f ac that the Town Meeting has not yet been convinced of the need; but <br />most agreed that it is politically wise, and that such an article would pro- <br />vide a forum for presentation of facts, and for Town Meeting consideration of <br />the whole Senior Center question. r <br />