Laserfiche WebLink
The rational behind decisions to raise <br />activities was outlined. fees on various types of <br />question of an elitist of Mrs. son, Recreati n Commit a a' f ec t i f ees are ra t se� beyond t �ie ?ember, �e� the <br />wi th several children. <br />of families wi lnanciai Val- <br />Mr. Dailey questioned the use of an Enterprise F� • <br />' P end far Recreation and <br />felt that because of the risk of decreased participation it may not work <br />noting that it is not like Sewer and mater usa ' <br />Mr. McSweeney aid ge. <br />Y he was concerned about the effect of increased fe <br />on Young people and said he had hoped some funds could be diverted s <br />course revenue for recreation, erted from golf <br />Mr. Marshall asked that figures on a gradual move to o self sufficiency be <br />developed to allow operation under an Enterprise Fund in about three years. <br />The Recreation Committee will work with the Town • <br />a three - ,year plan. Manager to provide such <br />HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE <br />Rene Cochin, Co- Chairman of the Human Services Commit ' <br />committee's charge and its of tee, outlined her <br />forts toward fulfilling its responsibilities for <br />the p as t ye ar. <br />a� The Committee had concluded that providers should be requested to <br />• <br />provide additional information to aid in monitoring programs • <br />v g P grams and expenditurest�. <br />to enable the committee to develop elop a data base for planning purposes and trN <br />allow for evaluation of the effectiveness of rams. <br />The Committee cons ro ' P g <br />considered the fiscal constraints of the Town as wel <br />the lessening of federal support in preparation of the b ' <br />in mind the social and budget, whsle keep .:. wrrr <br />financial costs of not maintaining human services <br />programs. <br />Mrs. Cochin summarized the Committee's recommended budget a g s follows- <br />CMARC, level funded at <br />. <br />$11,000; Council on Aging, increased by 8% to <br />$171,884. to include funding for Adult Da Health and • <br />Y Senior Health Monitor; <br />and Replace, decreased by 5% to $70,200. <br />REPLACE <br />Richard Dougherty of the Human Services Committee reviewed the request <br />of Replace for FY91 funding $ , , and his committee's recommendation <br />for $70,200. The Town Manager had included $0 funding or Re ' <br />proposed budget, <br />g Place in his <br />g <br />Mr. Dougherty stressed the need to continue the reventative services <br />ton oath P Aces <br />Replace offers to Lexington y and reported that 150 local families had <br />been served during the past years in the areas of counseling <br />ng and crisis <br />intervention and outreach. He noted that in ast ears <br />P y Replace has included <br />involvement with the Lexington Child Assault Program Lex <br />u S t CAPP) and has also <br />worked with the <br />p ublic schools in programs such as Peer Leadership. <br />Funding sources for RePlace were outlined including own of Lexington, <br />Mass. Dept, of Mental Health the g xtngton, <br />' School System, client fees, and private <br />contrib utions. Mr. Dougherty noted that RePlace has demonstrated a capacity <br />to develop more outside sup port as shown in the increased public and <br />foundation funding. Of the $70,200 recommended 45 0 <br />Educ s $ = 00 would be used to fund <br />Community tion and Outreach Services. For screening and referral <br />services, $25,200 would be allocated. The Committee recommends <br />regular monthly mends changing from <br />funding by a re <br />g thly allocation to a combination of grant and unit <br />rate. <br />