|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2008-12-01-CPC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Community Preservation Committee-CPC
>
Minutes
>
2006-2009
>
2008
>
2008-12-01-CPC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2019 11:17:42 AM
Creation date
10/19/2009 6:14:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - CPC - Community Preservation Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
operation if the East Lexington Station were closed. It was also noted that the <br />HDC has jurisdiction over the Fire Headquarters building, and that they would be <br />involved in the renovation. Mark Barrett said the final report from the Maguire <br />Group would probably be available to the Committee in the upcoming week. <br /> <br /> <br />2.Stone Building Renovation <br />– Connie Rawson, Director of the Library, and Pat <br />Goddard from Facilities spoke to this request for $271,660 for FY 2010. Ms. <br />Rawson explained that the study, which was approved by the CPC in 2006, had <br />recommended two options for upgrades to the building. One option called for the <br />renovation of the “ell”, while a second option suggested using the existing <br />footprint of the building for the necessary upgrades. The upgrades included <br />handicapped access on the first and second floors, the installation of an elevator, <br />and the construction of public bathrooms. Ms. Rawson said that at their <br />th <br />November 24 meeting, the Trustees of the Library had voted to discontinue <br />library services at the Stone Building, in favor of renovating the building for use <br />as a “Heritage Center”. Ms. Rawson explained that initial concepts for the Center <br />included meeting, performance and exhibition space. She said it would be more <br />than an Historical Center, and that it would include archive storage. She said the <br />Trustees were in favor of the reconstruction of the “ell” rather than trying to fit all <br />the necessary upgrades in the existing footprint of the building. <br /> <br />Ms. Weiss asked about the upgrades that were undertaken as part of the flood <br />insurance work. Ms. Rawson replied that there was a $25,000 deductible on the <br />policy, and that the work that was undertaken included replacing the ceilings, rugs <br />and other materials that were damaged. Mr. Goddard added that the net cost of the <br />work was $35,000. <br /> <br />There were a number of questions regarding the use of the Stone Building as a <br />“Heritage Center”. Ms. Shaw questioned whether more archive storage was <br />needed, in light of the CPC funding of the Town Offices archive project. Ms. <br />Fenollosa asked how the $271,660 would be expended, if the Library already had <br />plans showing two concepts for construction. Mr. Goddard replied that the <br />documents were not plans, and that more researched was needed into the issues of <br />access and historical preservation of the building. The Library will need detailed <br />design plans and specs before the work can go out to bid. <br /> <br />There were a number of questions about whether the Library’s idea of a Heritage <br />Center had received community exposure. Ms. Rawson said the meetings of the <br />Library Board had been well attended, and that to date the Waldorf School and <br />one of the area churches had expressed interest in using the Center for future <br />meetings. Mr. Kanter suggested that an article in the paper would be very helpful <br />and provide the Trustees with additional feedback before the process was too far <br />along. He felt broad community use would benefit the project during the <br />budgeting process. Mr. Wolk asked if the CPC would be better informed before <br />the Committee had to vote on the project. Ms. Krieger responded that the <br />Selectmen are represented on the Library Board of Trustees, and that the Board is <br /> 2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.