Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />2.Paying for the Leary land, Bonding vs. Cash <br />- The Committee discussed the <br />options of paying cash or bonding the Leary purchase. Mr. McSweeney made the <br />argument that since the CPC had the funds, the purchase should be paid in cash. <br />The Committee discussed the fact that with rates low at the moment, the Town <br />might actually make money on the bonding in future years. Mr. Lamb objected to <br />this possibility, stating that the Town was not in the business of arbitrage, and <br />felt that the Town would not make money through bonding. After further <br />discussion, Mr. McSweeney made a motion that the CPC pay cash for the Leary <br />land. The motion was seconded and unanimously passed. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />3.Update on the Pine Meadows Project Relative to Questions about the <br />Enterprise Fund <br /> – Ms. Shaw updated the Committee on the Pine Meadows <br />project, and specifically addressed questions that had arisen about the use of the <br />Enterprise Fund to pay for drainage improvements at the golf course. She <br />reported to the Committee that most recreation projects undertaken by the <br />Recreation Department are not CPA eligible. She said the Rec. Department also <br />pays for insurance, staff salaries, etc., and that the Fund has been decreasing over <br />the years. She noted that there would be an upcoming presentation on the <br />Enterprise Fund to educate Town Meeting members and the public about the <br />Fund. <br /> <br />Ms. Krieger asked Ms. Shaw if the Rec. Department would have to go to the <br />Town if it was unable to have the Pine Meadows project funded by the CPC, to <br />which Ms. Shaw replied affirmatively. Mr. Lamb, Chairman of the CEC, said he <br />was opposed to the Pine Meadows project, but that his Committee had voted 4-1 <br />in support. He questioned Ms. Shaw about whether the project was beneficial to <br />other wetland resources surrounding the golf course. Ms. Shaw replied that the <br />drainage work proposed at the golf course was designed to be beneficial to the <br />surrounding wetlands. The dredging of the pond, she explained, would increase <br />flood storage for the larger watershed, thereby reducing impacts of flooding. Mr. <br />Cohen reminded the Committee that the golf course is a significant “money <br />maker” for the Town. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />4.Final Discussion of Projects for Public Hearing <br /> – Ms. Weiss asked for a <br />updates on remaining projects which would be discussed at the CPC upcoming <br />hearing scheduled for the following night. <br /> <br />Mr. Valente updated the Committee on the progress of the Stone Building, for <br />which the present request was $180,000. Mr. Valente said this would include the <br />initial completion of an Historic Structures Report, which would come in at <br />approximately $50,000. Based upon the results of the report, he said steps would <br />be taken to protect the building using the additional monies in the appropriation. <br />Such repairs might include repairing windows, siding or roofing, in order to keep <br /> 2 <br /> <br />