Laserfiche WebLink
;ay (Adjourned Session of the 1983 Annual Town Meeting - April 6, 1983.) <br /> Article 14. (Motion as adopted under Article 14: (Cont.) <br /> (Cont.) <br /> 5.2.6 SPECIAL CONDITIONS, EXISTING SECOND DWELLING UNITS IN <br /> VIOLATION <br /> All second dwelling units which existed as of January 1, 1983, <br /> in a one family dwelling in an RO or RS district, except those <br /> which are a lawful, non- conforming use, or those which were <br /> granted a special permit under Table 1, Use Regulations Schedule, <br /> line 1.6, dwelling conversion to two family, or similar provisions <br /> of preceding Zoning By -Laws, are in violation of the Zoning <br /> By -Law. <br /> a. Owners of existing second dwelling units in violation must <br /> apply to the building commissioner for a determination of <br /> compliance with paragraph 5.2.2 before January 1, 1985. <br /> Applications shall be accompanied by a filing fee and by such <br /> plans and other documentation related to the conditions and <br /> requirements of paragraph 5.2.2, as may be required by the <br /> building commissioner. <br /> b. Within 90 days the building commissioner shall issue one of <br /> the following: <br /> 1. A determination of compliance with paragraph 5.2.2, and a <br /> certificate of occupancy. <br /> 2. A conditional determination of compliance with paragraph <br /> 5.2.2, describing corrective changes needed to bring the <br /> second dwelling unit into compliance, which changes shall <br /> be completed within 90 days of the date of the conditional <br /> determination. Upon successful completion of the re- <br /> quired changes, the building commissioner shall issue a <br /> certificate of occupancy. <br /> 3. A determination of non - compliance with one or more of the <br /> requirements of paragraph 5.2.2, together with a listing <br /> of those requirements and conditions with which com- <br /> pliance cannot be achieved through corrective changes. <br /> The owner of a second dwelling unit built prior to <br /> January 1, 1983 is eligible to apply within 60 days of the <br /> date of the determination to the SPGA for a special permit <br /> for maintenance of an existing, non - complying apartment, <br /> subject to the special conditions in subparagraph <br /> 5.2.6.c, below. <br /> C. Special conditions for second dwelling units constructed <br /> prior to January 1, 1983 that comply with at least subpara- <br /> graphs 5.2.2.a.1, 2, and 3; 5.2.2.b.1; and 5.2.2.c. <br /> 1. Upon presentation of evidence of construction prior to <br /> January 1, 1983, the owner may apply to the SPGA for a <br /> special permit for maintenance of an existing non- <br /> complying apartment. <br /> 2. The SPCA shall ordinarily grant a special permit for the <br /> existing non - complying second dwelling unit unless <br /> specific evidence is submitted supporting any claim that <br /> the unit has caused a deterioration of the single family <br /> neighborhood, a decrease in property values, or has <br /> caused any other substantial detrimental effect on the <br /> public welfare and convenience. In weighing such claims <br /> and evidence, the SPGA shall consider whether any changes <br /> .required to bring the second dwelling unit into com- <br /> pliance are sufficient to counteract any prior negative <br /> impact. <br /> 3. In granting a special permit, the SPGA may impose such <br /> additional conditions as it may deem necessary to protect <br /> the single family appearance of the dwelling, and to <br /> bring the dwelling as close to conformity with the � s <br /> conditions and requirements for new accessory apartments, <br /> paragraph 5.2.2, as is feasible. <br /> 4. A special permit granted by the SPGA shall include a <br /> condition that a certificate of occupancy shall be ob- <br /> tained for periods not to exceed three years in the same <br /> manner as set forth in paragraph 5.2.3. No subsequent <br /> certificate of occupancy shall be issued unless there is <br /> compliance with the plans and conditions approved by <br /> the SPGA. <br />