1982-03-01- to 1982-06-16-ATM-min

Browse Search

. (Adjourned Session of the 198 Annual Town Meeting - A pril 12, 1982.) Article 20. (b)(cont.) (Cont.) that the sum of $44,500 be appropriated for such land acquisition, construction, alteration and reconstruction of Outlook Drive as is necessary, and that such amount be raised in the tax levy. (c) That the sum of $6,500 be appropriated for survey work on Meadow Brook Avenue and Wellington Lane Avenue, and that such amount be raised in the tax levy. 9:55 P.M. Mr. Sacco explained that under (a) funds requested - zero; (b) funds requested - $44,500. (c) Meadow Brook Avenue and Wellington Lane Avenue have been withdrawn this year. 9.57 P.M. Les Brown, a resident at 65 Outlook Drive, spoke in favor of the motion and showed slides of Outlook Drive at its worst. 10:01 P.M. Nyles Nathan Barnert voiced the support of the Capital Expenditures Committee on this article. 10:01 P.M. unanimously Motion as presented by Mr. Sacco declared adopted /by voice vote. 10:01 P.M. Arthur C. Smith served notice of reconsideration of Article 19. 10 :02:P.M. Article 21. STREET CONSTRUCTION Presented by Robert F. Sacco. AND LANDTAKING MOTION: That this article be indefinitely postponed. Adopted unanimously. 10:02 P.M. Article 22. Presented by Margery M. Battin. MICROFILM PROGRAM (As MOTION: That the sum of $14,000 be appropriated for a microfilm adopted) program in the Inspection Department, and that such amount be raised in the tax levy. 10:02 P.M. In explaining the project, Mrs. Batti_n said that this is just the start of a new program and. the total cost of the program would be approximately $30,000. She justified the expenditure in terms of space saving and security. 10:03 P.M. William J. Dailey, Jr. stated that the Appropriation Committee opposed this motion as they felt that the equipment should not be purchased as it could not be used by all. departments and therefore they suggested unfavorable action.. 10:06 P.M. Mrs. Batti.n answered by saying that the reader /printer could be used by almost every department with the exception of the Engineering Department. 10:07 P.M. In answer to a question raised by Laura F. Nichols, the Town Clerk stated that although she had not seen the reader /printer, she assumed that it could be used in regards to the microfilm records in the office of the Town Clerk. 10:10 P.M. A voice vote was taken on the main motion which was doubted by the Moderator_, so a standing vote was taken as follows: