|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2021-02-01-CONCOM-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Conservation Commission-ConCom
>
Minutes
>
2021
>
2021-02-01-CONCOM-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2021 10:22:37 AM
Creation date
5/21/2021 10:22:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Department
Town Clerk
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - CONCOM - Conservation Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
— There is currently a low-quality wetland habitat in the construction easement with a <br /> presence of invasive species. Historic utility work has altered the drainage pattern. <br /> — Vegetation should grow within the rip rap and, if not overtaken by severe storms, grass <br /> will grow within the riprap. <br /> 7:50 PM <br /> Informal Meeting: Town Engineering Project, Drainage Improvements Waltham Street Culvert, <br /> Woodard and Curran <br /> Mr. Michael Sprague, Senior Civil Engineer for the Town of Lexington, and Denise Cameron, <br /> Project Manager at Woodard and Curran, presented the proposal before the Commission. The <br /> purpose of this proposal is to address localized flooding issues in the neighborhood of <br /> Valleyfield Street and Grassland Street due to the area being of very low gradient. Ms. Cameron <br /> stated that most of the work is to be done within the street itself and within the 200-foot <br /> riverfront area. <br /> Questions from the Commission: <br /> — Were you able to find construction records to see what geotechnical conditions other <br /> utility companies ran into? <br /> — Would you make the culvert wider if there were no width constraints? <br /> — Is the proposal to do a natural stream bed in the culvert? <br /> Responses from the Representative: <br /> — There are no records that indicate that when the culvert went in there was any mitigation. <br /> The sewer is unknown but they did look at the latest CCTVs on the sewer and it is in <br /> good shape. Anticipate the removal of some peat. <br /> — We want to be able to allow them to open up sections and get in fairly quickly. We are <br /> limited to a trench box but still have some flexibility and will look into it. <br /> — It will be challenging to accomplish a natural stream bed because of how close the <br /> utilities are currently. <br /> Mr. Bitsko asked whether this type of work is done when it is dry or when there is less flow and <br /> whether the project team will be promoting a certain construction schedule. Ms. Cameron <br /> responded that the preference is July and August when the stream volume and chance of storms <br /> are the lowest. <br /> 8:06 PM <br /> Informal Meeting: MyRWA Stormwater Improvement Grant, Town Land Maple Street <br /> Mr. Michael Sprague and Ms. Catherine Pedemonti, Project Manager at the Mystic River <br /> Watershed Association, presented the proposal before the Commission. <br /> Ms. Dohan asked if there will be a potential for educational opportunities and the project team <br /> will be discussing that in more detail once they have a better idea of what is out there. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.