Laserfiche WebLink
Project: Addition to a single-family dwelling <br /> Previous Hearing Dates: 6/29/2020, 7/27/2020 <br /> Supplemental Documentation Submitted: <br /> - Engineering Drainage Calculations prepared by Gala Simon INC. Revised June 30, 2020 <br /> Markus Pinney, representative for homeowner of 25 Peacock Farm Road, presented before the <br /> Commission. They received the memo from the Town Engineer stating they are in compliance. <br /> On a motion by Ms. Samuels and seconded by Mr. Langseth, the Commission voted 5-0 by roll <br /> call vote to close the Hearing. <br /> Record of vote as follows: <br /> Ruth Ladd—Aye <br /> David Langseth—Aye <br /> Holly Samuels —Aye <br /> Duke Bisko —Aye <br /> Philip Hamilton—Aye <br /> Mr. Beuttell and Ms. Dohan did not participate in the vote as they were both absent from the <br /> previous hearing on July 27, 2020. <br /> ViewPoint Cloud Permit 4CNOI-20-19, DEP File # 201-XXX <br /> Notice of Intent, 1050 Waltham Street <br /> Applicant: Nicholas Skoly, VHB <br /> Project: Redevelopment of Commercial Property to construct new commercial building and <br /> parking garage <br /> Previous Hearing Dates: 7/27/2020 <br /> Supplemental Documentation Submitted: <br /> Nicholas Skoly, Civil Engineer, presented before the Commission. They did receive the engineer <br /> comment. There were minor comments and they had responses to that. He reviewed the <br /> comments and his responses. <br /> Concerns of the Commission: <br /> - Is this the site where the applicant was using the same curve number for open space <br /> and good condition for group A and group D <br /> - Using test pit two data, the infiltration will be extended a hundred feet to the north. <br /> How do you know that sand covers that whole area? <br /> Responses of the Applicant: <br /> - It was this site. They went through those numbers. They have the 80 curve number for the <br /> greater than 75% grass cover in good condition which is what they modeled the existing <br /> site on and they also used it for the proposed landscape area. There is no area associated <br /> with the other hydraulic soil groups. <br /> - Everything is group D. The description is incorrect, this can be updated. <br />