2020-10-28-NAC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

• Enforcement—a general concern was how enforcement of a GLB bylaw would take place. In particular whether enforcement could be achieved without harm to workers and whether homeowners would be responsible for improper use of GLBs by landscapers they employ. The Committee discussed the issue of enforcement. It was suggested that the police department has indicated a reluctance to enforce a noise bylaw related to GLBs.The Committee considered this and various suggestions were made including approaching the Police Chief and the Town General Manager to discuss enforcement.Jay noted that, based on his experience, enforcement will be a challenge on the issue of whether GLB's are being used outside of the permitted times. Dan suggested that enforcement should take place based on measured decibels at a 50-foot range based on models. • Education—community groups suggested that NAC emphasize the air quality issue which contributes to the death of millions per year. In particular, GLB operation is seen as bad for the lungs which is significant during the pandemic. Groups also suggested that the vibration injury caused by backpack GLBs be added to the list of harmful effects. Specific requests by community groups during follow up meetings included NAC providing further information on the cost of electric/battery GLB equipment, data concerning the number and scale of landscaping companies operating in Lexington and the provision of a list of other communities in MA that have limited or banned GLBs. Generally, community groups also requested the opportunity to review the final language of the proposed bylaw. o Survey Results Mark M. updated the Committee on the most recent results of the GLB survey on Google Forms.The Committee reviewed his report. Of the 418 total responses received to date, 68%of respondents indicated that they were bothered by GLB noise. Similar levels of concern were reported for detrimental health effects related to the use and operation of GLBs, contribution to air pollution and destruction of insect and other natural habitats. Mark noted that several people responding to the survey indicated that they wanted to help with the issue. Dan suggested that we advise interested parties to communicate with their Town Meeting members and engage with their neighbors on the issue. However, he advised that they should not be advised to contact Select Board members as the Select Board relies on its Committees to aggregate public input. o Discussion of possible amendments to Draft Bylaw The Committee considered feedback received to date from various parties and discussed potential revisions to the draft bylaw under the following headings: • Phase-in of seasonal limits