Laserfiche WebLink
within 1000 feet of the project limits will need to be notified by certified mail, the Hayden <br /> Woods Trust Fund will be covering the cost of mailings, legal ads, and application fees, the DEP <br /> will issue the filing number, and a separate application will need to be submitted to Natural <br /> Heritage because of the proximity to a vernal pool. <br /> Ms. Mullins asked the Commission if they had attended a site visit for 7 Fulton Road(ViewPoint <br /> Cloud 4 CTRE-20-8)regarding a potentially hazardous tree. Members of the Commission <br /> confirmed that they visited the site and, based on visual inspection, the tree did not appear to be a <br /> current hazard, except for a couple of minor dead limbs. The Commission is open to a certified <br /> arborist providing an evaluation of the tree for supplemental review. It was also requested that, if <br /> the tree is taken down, that it be replaced. <br /> 7:00 pm New Public Meetings/Hearings <br /> ViewPoint Cloud 4CNOI-20-21, DEP 201-1192 <br /> Notice of Intent, 3 Goffe Road <br /> Applicant: Lily Y Li Family Trust, Frank Hsieh and Lily Li, Trustees <br /> Project: Demolish in-ground pool and construct addition <br /> Documents Submitted.- <br /> -Plot <br /> ubmitted:-Plot Plan for 3 Goffe Road,prepared by Scott M. Cerrato, PLS No. 50049, dated <br /> 712612020 <br /> -Construction Documents,prepared by Chih-Ming Lee, RA No. 20752, dated <br /> 81312020 <br /> -Mass DEP Notice oflntentApplication,prepared by Norse Environmental, Inc., <br /> dated 811712020 <br /> -Stormwater Analysis,prepared by Sullivan Engineering Group, LLC., John D. <br /> Sullivan, PE No. 41586, dated 812812020 <br /> -3 Goffe Rd NOI Engineering Comments,prepared by Michael Sprague, Town of <br /> Lexington Engineering, dated 911 712 02 0 (1 page Memorandum) <br /> Maureen Herald, a representative from Norse Environmental, presented on behalf of the <br /> homeowner. The applicant is proposing to raze the pool and concrete patio to construct a single <br /> family addition with a decrease in total impervious area and providing rooftop infiltration. <br /> Concerns of the Commission: <br /> -Has there been an engineering review on the stormwater design? <br /> -Is the fence coming down as part of the project? <br /> -Cannot close the matter until there is an engineering department sign-off. <br /> Responses of the Applicant: <br /> -Fence will remain <br /> -A re-analysis will be provided to the Commission. <br /> Per Michael Sprague, Town of Lexington Engineering, the stormwater analysis does not <br /> demonstrate compliance with the Performance Standard 5(2) of the Lexington Wetlands <br /> Protection Code. It also does not demonstrate compliance with Standard 5(6). <br />