Laserfiche WebLink
LEED EAp2 and EAc2 Minimum/Optimize Energy Performance <br /> The project team has set an energy performance target to reduce energy consumption by at least 30%when <br /> compared to the ASHRAE baseline. The ASHRAE version will remain TBD. The new Massachusetts energy <br /> code specifies ASHRAE 2016. <br /> CES presented their findings in the Mechanical System Options report to the team. Three different options for <br /> mechanical systems were analyzed; Option 1 includes geothermal heating, a water source VRF system for <br /> heating and cooling, and a DOAS system for ventilation. Option 2 includes air source VRF's, and Option 3 <br /> includes a conventional fossil fuel boiler heated system and cooling from a chiller [this is only being studied for <br /> baseline information]. CES is working on a Life Cycle Costing Analysis (LCCA)of each option and will provide <br /> an update once complete. <br /> The team discussed the possibility of mechanical system Option 1. This system, in conjunction with onsite <br /> renewable energy production, may make zero net energy possible. A geothermal bore field would need to be <br /> installed. Conductance Testing must be done early to determine the size of the bore field. Once the bore field <br /> have been burried they require little to no maintenance. <br /> o Action item: Town to draft proposal for Conductance Testing. It cannot be scheduled on a Tuesday <br /> due to weekly farmers market in the lawn where geothermal bore field would be located. <br /> o Action item: CES to continue working on the LCCA of the different systems options. <br /> LEED EAp3 and EAc3 Building Level and Advanced Energy Metering <br /> The project team intends to explore the LEED v4 criteria for installing whole building energy meters as well as <br /> advanced energy meters in order to track energy performance through a building automation system. <br /> If done early, the electrical panels can be configured to be in line with the energy end uses that need sub <br /> meters. This will allow the project team to purchase fewer sub meters. <br /> LEED EAc4: Demand Response <br /> The project will explore designing the systems to accommodate a future utility demand response program, as <br /> one does not exist yet. The team understands that this credit may not be a good fit for an emergency facility, <br /> but the design will still have the ability to reduce demand during peak demand periods. <br /> LEED EAc5: Renewable Energy Production <br /> The project is exploring an onsite renewable energy system to offset operating energy use by 20%. This may <br /> be supplemented with offsite renewable energy production. Renewable energy system may be a solar canopy <br /> in the parking area. <br /> L Lex 1: Utilize Energy Storage <br /> Further discussions on this required. Battery back-up may be used to manage demand but may not meet <br /> back-up and emergency power requirements of a public safety facility which is required to be fully operational <br /> 24/7. <br /> L Lex 2: Net Zero Energy <br /> The team discussed net zero energy throughout the meeting and continuously discussed ways to approach <br /> this goal. Some sort of fossil fuel use is likely for back-up power, but an all-electric HVAC option is on the <br /> table. Project may consider a mix of on-site and off-site options to meet net zero. <br /> There needs to be more information here;perhaps in the form f a <br /> INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY /Mprehetnsiive <br /> lengthy footnote. What is the status of the TGE 8/7/19 product? Wi <br /> be mature enough for the Police Station project?" <br /> L Lex 6: Toxics <br /> The Town of Lexington's goals include selethat protect the health and wellbeing of the building <br /> occupants. The Town wants to develop a cpolicy that addresses all chemicals of concern and <br /> integrates both the LEED requirements for Low Emitting Materials as well as the Town of Lexington's Red List <br /> of materials to avoid. The team understands that following the new policy will be challenging but an important <br /> effort for establishing safe building standards. The team also understands that once the work is done to <br /> develop an approved list of materials for the police station, future projects may refer to this list. <br /> o Action item: TGE to develop a draft Chemicals of Concern and Avoidance Policy(provided on 8/7/19). <br /> PBC Meeting 06.05.19 3 <br />