Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Krieger then asked the applicant to address the Conservation Administrators comment <br /> about mitigating runoff(Ms. Elliot stated there is a plan for a drywell). <br /> Mr. Raley confirmed they would be doing a storm water management system. <br /> A Board Member, David G. Williams, asked what was going to be underneath the carport (Mr. <br /> Flavin stated there is no usable space, just foundation). <br /> Mr. Williams asked about an easement (Ms. Elliot stated that term came from the Engineering <br /> Department comment about the right of way. They have a fund to pave Swan Lane. They do not <br /> know what the 10 foot distance is between Swan Lane and the property line). <br /> Mr. Williams asked the Zoning Administrator if that 10 feet is owned by the Town. <br /> The Zoning Administrator stated Swan Lane is not a public Road and they would most likely <br /> need the Planning Department for a street determination because they are adding more than <br /> one thousand square feet of gross floor area. <br /> A Board Member, Norman P. Cohen, stated now they will have room for four parking spaces <br /> and asked if the neighbors have been in support (Ms. Elliot stated the neighbors have been <br /> supportive). <br /> The materials being used to build the carport were discussed. <br /> Chair, Ralph D. Clifford, asked if the intent is to keep both driveways (Ms. Elliot stated that was <br /> correct). One of the grounds for a variance is compelling hardship. This is a lot where topology <br /> is met with a variance. Although there is not a compelling hardship considering there is already <br /> a place to park three cars. He asked why is there a compelling hardship to put in this carport <br /> (Ms. Elliot stated it is tight for three cars in that driveway. Also Swan Lane is narrow so you can't <br /> park on the road. Most people have a two car garage and then a driveway to park the cars in <br /> behind the driveway). <br /> An audience member, Peter Warren of 11 Moon Hill Road, stated his support for the project. <br /> There were no further questions or comments from the audience. <br /> The Hearing was closed at 7:54 PM. <br /> Ms. Krieger stated it is a safety issue with the small road and she has no objection. <br /> A Board Member, Nyles N. Barnert, stated he agreed with Ms. Krieger. <br /> Mr. Clifford stated he is going to vote no because there is not a compelling hardship. <br /> There were no further questions or comments from the Board. <br />