Laserfiche WebLink
APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE—2.020 ATM 25 March 2020 <br /> Proposed Legislation <br /> The special legislation proposed in the motion under this article6 would not eliminate the 16%interest rate <br /> but would mitigate its impact by delaying its imposition for one year after the death of a person whose taxes <br /> have been deferred if the property has not yet been sold or conveyed. During that one-year delay, interest <br /> would not be waived altogether but would continue to accrue for each year's deferral at the original CMT <br /> rate applied to that deferral. <br /> If the property is sold or conveyed, either before or after the death of the person whose taxes have been <br /> deferred, but the full amount of the deferrals plus accrued interest is not immediately paid, then the 16% <br /> interest rate would take effect. <br /> Committee Recommendation <br /> The goal of the 41A deferral program is to alleviate the property tax burden on low-to moderate-income <br /> homeowners, and the low interest rate system adopted by the Town in 2006 is an integral component of <br /> that program. This Committee believes it is sensible and appropriate to delay any increase in interest rates <br /> on deferred taxes for up to a year after death if the property has not yet been sold or conveyed. This delay <br /> would allow a reasonable time for the estate to arrange a sale or conveyance. The income that would oth- <br /> erwise be generated with a higher interest rate is not a significant revenue source for the Town,and its delay <br /> for one year would have no material impact on the Town's finances. <br /> The Committee recommends approval by a vote of(8-0). <br /> Article 8 <br /> Short Term Rental Impact Fee <br /> Funds Requested Funding Source Committee Recommendation <br /> None N/A Approve (7-0-1) <br /> This article proposes that the Town accept the entirety of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 64G, Sec- <br /> tions 3A&3D. In combination with new zoning legislation proposed under Article 36,this would regulate <br /> the types of units that can be used for short term rentals in Lexington and impose a 3%community impact <br /> fee for such rentals. Our report focuses on the financial implications of these proposed legislative changes. <br /> Town Meeting voted to accept M.G.L. c. 64G, §3A at a special town meeting in November 2009. If Town <br /> Meeting accepts both M.G.L. c. 64G, § 31)(a) and § 31)(b), which requires a separate vote for each sub- <br /> section,then a 3%community impact fee will be imposed on short term rentals of any unit in a two-family <br /> or three-family dwelling in Lexington. The zoning bylaw change proposed under Article 36 would further <br /> limit short term rentals to units in owner-occupied dwellings only. <br /> The state-wide room occupancy excise tax rate is 5.7%. Beginning July 1, 2010, per the local adoption of <br /> c. 64G, §3A, Lexington imposed a 6% local option room occupancy tax, which is paid in addition to the <br /> state tax, for a total room occupancy tax of 11.7%. This tax applies to room rentals of 90 days or less in <br /> 6 The proposed legislation would amend the special act previously obtained by Lexington, Chapter 190 of the Acts of <br /> 2008, which allowed Lexington to vary the eligibility provisions of Clause 41A. For a description of the 2008 Act, <br /> see the discussion of Article 6 above. The language in the motion differs somewhat from the language contained in <br /> the Warrant but has the same objective.A similar amendment of Clause 4I that would apply generally to all munic- <br /> ipalities was proposed last year by our State Representative but did not advance out of committee,hence the need for <br /> special legislation. <br /> 25 <br />