Laserfiche WebLink
Breadcrumb Navigation:
Mr. Clifford stated the good news is this is a condominium. The applicant should to go to the <br /> Planning Board and state they want to put the two parcels together (The deed says its one <br /> parcel, why does that not count). The master deed mentions two different parcels as being <br /> owned by the condominium. The condominium owns parcel A and parcel B but that doesn't <br /> mean they are the same parcel. <br /> A Board Member, Norman P. Cohen, stated he agrees with Mr. Clifford and read it was a <br /> condominium. He asked wouldn't parcels A and B already be one unit because it has been <br /> combined by use (De facto, it has been used as one parcel. Documents indicate common use of <br /> the parcel). <br /> Mr. Clifford recommended the applicant take a continuance and talk to the Planning <br /> Department. The exhibit A centre oak condominium parcel description, record from the Registry <br /> of Deeds, maintains the separate lots with different square feet so as two different zoning <br /> parcels. He stated he does not think de facto merger puts two parcels together. Chapter 41 <br /> section 81 P says you can go to the Planning Board and say this is not a subdivision and get an <br /> AN R. <br /> Mr. Erickson agreed to a continuance. <br /> Mr. Clifford then stated he has submitted two documents to the file for record. <br /> On a motion by Beth Masterman and seconded by Jeanne K. Krieger the Board voted 5-0, to <br /> grant a continuance to May 28, 2020 Hearing. <br />