Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Barnert questioned how it will be maintained (From below and above. It is within 5 feet of <br /> the lot line it will be made of non-combustible cement board product that is painted and has a <br /> much longer lifetime). <br /> A Board Member, David G. Williams, asked if they could push it back (There is a window and <br /> they do not want to block all the light coming into the house). <br /> Mr. Williams stated his opposition and asked if it is open on all sides (It is open on three sides, <br /> there are no walls. They are not asking for a side yard relief. They are expanding the use, it's <br /> already parking). <br /> A Board Member, Jeanne K. Krieger, asked what would prevent the next owner from closing <br /> this up (Mr. Clifford stated they could put a condition). <br /> Chair, Ralph D. Clifford, stated he liked the design but it is on the property line. To do any <br /> maintenance they will be trespassing. The requirement is to look at the change in terms of how <br /> it will impact the neighborhood. This is problematic. There are two solutions, make is smaller or <br /> obtain an easement from the neighbor. The impact on the neighborhood is too extreme. <br /> Gerry McGowen, of 4 Wallis Court, stated if they take it back it will block the last open window <br /> they have. The neighbor has written a letter in support of the proposal. Next door is a <br /> commercial building with parking on that side. <br /> Mr. Clifford stated the next door neighbor might not want anybody on the property. <br /> Solar panels were discussed. <br /> The Board discussed the proposal. <br /> The applicant requested a withdrawal without prejudice. <br /> On a motion by Nyles N. Barnert and seconded by Jeanne K. Krieger, the Board voted 5-0, to <br /> grant a withdrawal without prejudice. <br />