Laserfiche WebLink
requested that Ms.Tintocalis present the Committee with a memo detailing the scope of the <br /> project and a timeline of when funds are going to be spent by the first week of December, to be <br /> available for the December 5t" CPC meeting. <br /> Farmview LexHAB- Mr. Goddard came before the Committee to discuss the supplemental <br /> request for FY21 CPA funding as well as the memo between the Town of Lexington and LexHAB <br /> regarding the Farmview project. Ms. Kosnoff stated that it was her understanding that LexHAB <br /> would not come back to the Town for additional funding and that she would not have signed <br /> the memo between the Town and LexHAB if that was their intention. Mr. Pressman suggested a <br /> Special Town Meeting (STM) to have an article on the warrant for$153,750 so that funds would <br /> be available at the close of the STM to complete the work at Farmview. Mr. Hornig asked if the <br /> appropriation was available on May 1, 2020 would that be acceptable to get the work done. <br /> Mr. Goddard said yes. Mr. Goddard explained that LexHAB made a commitment to the Town in <br /> the Memo. LexHAB is committed to completing the project and when funding was denied by <br /> Mass Housing LexHAB pursued additional funding from the CPC to fulfil the commitment to the <br /> Town. Mr. Pato stated that the BOS has not discussed the request yet but the Board interpreted <br /> the memo as LexHAB would not be back for additional funding. A future request for funding <br /> from LexHAB will be met with a high sense of skepticism. Ms. Manz stated that the Capital <br /> Expenditures Committee has not reviewed the FY21 CPA funding request or the memo but is <br /> encouraged to know LexHAB has the funds to cover the commitment without Town support. <br /> Ms. Manz suggested that if LexHAB has sufficient funds to cover the work it would be in their <br /> best interests to do so instead of presenting the request to Town Meeting for the third time. <br /> Mr. Wolk asked if the property rents were sufficient enough to cover the maintenance of the <br /> properties. Mr. Goddard explained on an individual basis the rents are not sufficient to cover <br /> the maintenance on the properties but when the figures are net out it is sufficient. Ms. Walker <br /> stated that the current problem with the memo is a problem of interpretation of a paragraph <br /> and then proceeded to read a list of the number of individuals on the waiting list for affordable <br /> housing in Lexington. Mr. Hornig stated that the $169,347 has potential legal problems and the <br /> $153,750 has potential political problems. It was the general consensus of the Committee to <br /> seek advice from Town Counsel.The Committee voted in a straw poll to support the project at <br /> $153,750 (5-1-1). Ms. Fenollosa abstained and Mr. Pato voted no. <br /> FY21 CPA Funding Request- Daisy Wilson Meadow Preservation- Mr. Hamilton requested <br /> $22,425 in CPA funds to preserve approximately 5 acres of meadow at Daisy Wilson Meadow to <br /> improve passive recreation opportunities, enhance wildlife and plant habitat. The project is part <br /> of a multi-year Conservation Meadow Preservation Program. <br /> Mr. Hornig asked if the Committee will see an annual request for meadow preservation. Mr. <br /> Hamilton explained that Daisy Wilson Meadow has been neglected and that is the reason for <br /> the request. The Conservation Commission does anticipate another request in FY22 for West <br /> 2 <br />