Laserfiche WebLink
APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE - STM 2018-1 <br />All deposits into specified stabilization funds are covered under this article. No withdrawals from any of <br />the funds are planned for this Special Town Meeting. <br />This article proposes to appropriate $94,070 into the Tr'anspor'tation Demand Management Stabilization <br />Fund. This includes a one-time payment of $37,500 from Pinnacle Park and annual payments made under <br />previous Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs). The fund was initially created to support the Lexpress bus <br />service and the 2016 Annual Town Meeting extended the purpose of this fund to "supporting the planning <br />and operations of transportation services to serve the needs of town residents and businesses." <br />This article also proposes to appropriate $4,766 into the Tr'anspor'tation Management Overlay District Sta- <br />bilization Fund. This includes the first payment made under the 3 Maguire Road MOU. The fund was <br />created for the purpose of financing transportation infrastructure improvements. <br />This article also proposes to appropriate $45,004 of surplus revenue into the Capital Stabilization Fund that <br />was created for the purpose of setting aside funds to finance future capital projects of the town. <br />As of publication there were no other monies to be transferred into stabilization funds. However, if any <br />payments are received prior to the vote on this article, those payments would be deposited into special <br />revenue accounts. The motion would then be revised to allow Town Meeting to transfer the money into the <br />specified stabilization fund from those corresponding special revenue accounts. <br />The Committee recommends approval of this request (9-0). <br />Article 2018-1.10: Amend Zoning Bylaw — 55 & 56 Watertown Street <br />Funds Requested <br />Funding Source <br />Committee Recommendation <br />None <br />N/A <br />None <br />This article seeks approval of a rezoning to allow 116 independent living units, 40 assisted living units, and <br />48 memory care units to be built under the names of Waterstone and Bridges at 55 & 56 Watertown Street <br />on open land now owned by Belmont Country Club. The proposed sites are currently zoned as Residential <br />Outlying (RO) which allows single-family homes on lots with a minimum lot size of 30,000 square feet to <br />be built by right. Further information on the proposal may be found in the report of the Planning Board to <br />this Special Town Meeting. <br />Here we comment on the possible fiscal impacts of the proposed project. There are also significant non - <br />fiscal aspects to this rezoning request, and our analysis is not intended to establish either a positive or <br />negative position with respect to approval of this article. Rather, it is solely intended to help inform Town <br />Meeting in terms of the fiscal impacts of the proposal. The Committee makes no recommendation on this <br />article. <br />Developer's Fiscal Impact Study <br />The developer has submitted a revised "fiscal impact" study. This study considers the revenue that would <br />be directly received by the Town and the expenses that would be incurred by the Town in directly servicing <br />the facilities and residents thereof. The study estimates annual recurring revenues of $785,800 from real <br />estate and personal property taxes, excise taxes on residents' vehicles, ambulance receipts, and health in- <br />spection fees. The study estimates annual Town expenses of $408,300, primarily due to providing additional <br />ambulance, fire, and police services for the residents. <br />These estimates do not include the impact on the Town's shared expenses, including the health insurance <br />and retirement plans for any new Town staff hiring attributable to this development. The impact on shared <br />expenses would reduce the estimated net positive impact modestly, but not enough to drive it negative. <br />There may also be incremental costs in other departments (e.g., senior programs at the Community Center) <br />not considered in the developer's impact study, but again they would be unlikely to change the positive <br />sign of the net estimate. <br />0 <br />