Laserfiche WebLink
APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE-STM 2018-1 <br /> All deposits into specified stabilization funds are covered under this article. No withdrawals from any of <br /> the funds are planned for this Special Town Meeting. <br /> This article proposes to appropriate $94,070 into the Transportation Demand Management Stabilization <br /> Fund. This includes a one-time payment of$37,500 from Pinnacle Park and annual payments made under <br /> previous Memoranda of Understanding(MOUs).The fund was initially created to support the Lexpress bus <br /> service and the 2016 Annual Town Meeting extended the purpose of this fund to "supporting the planning <br /> and operations of transportation services to serve the needs of town residents and businesses." <br /> This article also proposes to appropriate $4,766 into the Transportation Management Overlay District Sta- <br /> bilization Fund. This includes the first payment made under the 3 Maguire Road MOU. The fund was <br /> created for the purpose of financing transportation infrastructure improvements. <br /> This article also proposes to appropriate$45,004 of surplus revenue into the Capital Stabilization Fund that <br /> was created for the purpose of setting aside funds to finance future capital projects of the town. <br /> As of publication there were no other monies to be transferred into stabilization funds. However, if any <br /> payments are received prior to the vote on this article, those payments would be deposited into special <br /> revenue accounts. The motion would then be revised to allow Town Meeting to transfer the money into the <br /> specified stabilization fund from those corresponding special revenue accounts. <br /> The Committee recommends approval of this request(9-0). <br /> Article 2018-1.10: Amend Zoning Bylaw— 55 & 56 Watertown Street <br /> Funds Requested Funding Source Committee Recommendation <br /> None N/A None <br /> This article seeks approval of a rezoning to allow 116 independent living units,40 assisted living units,and <br /> 48 memory care units to be built under the names of Waterstone and Bridges at 55 & 56 Watertown Street <br /> on open land now owned by Belmont Country Club. The proposed sites are currently zoned as Residential <br /> Outlying(RO)which allows single-family homes on lots with a minimum lot size of 30,000 square feet to <br /> be built by right. Further information on the proposal may be found in the report of the Planning Board to <br /> this Special Town Meeting. <br /> Here we comment on the possible fiscal impacts of the proposed project. There are also significant non- <br /> fiscal aspects to this rezoning request, and our analysis is not intended to establish either a positive or <br /> negative position with respect to approval of this article. Rather, it is solely intended to help inform Town <br /> Meeting in terms of the fiscal impacts of the proposal. The Committee makes no recommendation on this <br /> article. <br /> Developer's Fiscal Impact Study <br /> The developer has submitted a revised"fiscal impact" study. This study considers the revenue that would <br /> be directly received by the Town and the expenses that would be incurred by the Town in directly servicing <br /> the facilities and residents thereof. The study estimates annual recurring revenues of$785,800 from real <br /> estate and personal property taxes, excise taxes on residents' vehicles, ambulance receipts, and health in- <br /> spection fees.The study estimates annual Town expenses of$408,300,primarily due to providing additional <br /> ambulance, fire, and police services for the residents. <br /> These estimates do not include the impact on the Town's shared expenses, including the health insurance <br /> and retirement plans for any new Town staff hiring attributable to this development. The impact on shared <br /> expenses would reduce the estimated net positive impact modestly,but not enough to drive it negative. <br /> There may also be incremental costs in other departments (e.g., senior programs at the Community Center) <br /> not considered in the developer's impact study, but again they would be unlikely to change the positive <br /> sign of the net estimate. <br /> 8 <br />