Laserfiche WebLink
The Zoning Administrator stated only the gross floor area specifies residential. Regardless of <br /> residential or non-residential the side yard and front yard setbacks are zero and the rear yard is <br /> a 10 foot requirement. <br /> Mr. Barnert stated his concern for maintenance on the one inch of land. <br /> A Board Member, David G. Williams, stated they have had requests for carports before that <br /> have been denied. He stated this is not something he could vote for (Mr. Smith stated there is a <br /> need for the carport. In the Central Business District you can go up to the lot lines). <br /> Chair, Ralph D. Clifford, asked if the attic bathroom already exists (Mr. Smith responded that it <br /> was to be renovated. They are modifying the bathtub which triggers the ceiling height change <br /> requirement). <br /> A way of voting was discussed and the possibility of withdrawing the carport. <br /> Mr. Clifford stated to maintain that one inch of land they would be trespassing on the neighbors <br /> land. <br /> Alternate member, Hank Manz, suggested getting permission from the neighbor to go on their <br /> land. <br /> An audience member, Daniel Rapperport of 2 and 6-8 Wallis Court, stated his support and <br /> asked the Board if they would be more open to a garage (Mr. Williams responded the same <br /> rules should apply as a carport). <br /> Mr. Smith stated there is no sideyard setback requirement. <br /> Mr. Clifford stated they have to evaluate the impact on the neighborhood. The current owner <br /> may be happy with the close setback but the next owner might not be (Mr. Smith stated the <br /> gross floor area bylaw was created to protect residential districts. Any other use would be much <br /> more invasive). <br /> An audience member, William Dailey of 114 Marrett Road, stated his family owns an office <br /> building that has a parking lot that runs behind 6-8 and 2-4 Wallis Court. He stated his support <br /> and the need for the carport. <br /> A Board member, Jeanne K. Krieger, stated she would support the carport because it would be <br /> less intrusive than a garage. <br /> Withdrawal of the carport was discussed. <br /> An audience member, Gerry McGowen of 4 Wallis Court, stated the need for the carport. <br /> People park in their area and they have been subjected to numerous fines because they have <br /> nowhere to park. This situation has impacted their life style and ability to park at their own <br /> home. <br /> Mr. Smith stated he would withdraw without prejudice the request for the carport. <br /> Mr. Clifford suggested putting up signs to help with parking. <br /> Mr. Clifford stated the total gross floor area change would be 55 additional square feet. That <br /> makes the total gross floor area 5,025 square feet. <br />