Laserfiche WebLink
cars should not have to treat bike riders different from pedestrians. Kevin commented <br /> that riders go around him when he stops at intersections. Other comments: <br /> • Some intersections with good sight lines have stop signs that should be yields; <br /> • Many cars go too fast coming from the center at Hancock St. There should be better <br /> signage, even though residents complain about the signage in that area. <br /> • The word is, the local residents will not approve of a light or more signage, even <br /> though it's needed; <br /> • DPW has approved survey money to survey what is going on at Hancock; Ross will <br /> look into lights, but don't think they will be approved; <br /> • Mike: we shouldn't not propose lights because we think they won't be approved; <br /> • A letter ought to go to the Select Board recommending a light at Hancock intersection; <br /> • Cambridge has a special speed hump at intersection crossings; <br /> • Part of stopping is making sure it is safe before proceeding. Cars can be cited for not <br /> making sure it is safe before going. <br /> • Davis Square is better than it was. We could learn from Somerville's bike committee. <br /> • Someone called the DPW to complain they couldn't get into Depot parking lot <br /> because of bike traffic on a weekend. <br /> • Cars have made Uturns using the Bikeway. Staff put up cones to prevent this. <br /> • If police and DPW change the signs to all stops, that will be a step backward; <br /> • Design of the Depot booth is bad. Long term solution is redesign. Need a short term <br /> solution. If cars stop at Depot booth, do they need to stop again at bike path? <br /> • Sgt Callahan said that stops are consistent, but from practical standpoint, people will <br /> slow, look, and go. That means yield makes more sense. If every intersection had <br /> consistent (similar) signs, they would be more enforceable. <br /> • Streets are signed differently, so why not the bike path? <br /> • Paul: if you are going to put a flashing pedestrian light at Hancock, put it on a sensor, <br /> like Mill St. Lots of people do not push a button. <br /> • Ross: buttons can only be used if the light will turn red and stop the traffic. <br /> • Peggy asked: does the committee agree that all signs should be the same? Or that <br /> yield signs should have good sight lines? <br /> • Matt: Hancock should have a traffic calming measure. <br /> • Paul: you stand a chance of getting a flashing light at Hancock. Sight line is a <br /> • Result of Discussion: <br /> A motion was offered by Omar and seconded by Kevin: <br /> • Fottler intersection on the bikeway should be a stop sign (i.e., we agree that yield is <br /> not appropriate owing to sightline problems); <br /> • Revere and Fletcher should retain yield on the bikeway, but find way to alert <br /> motorists; <br /> • Remove stop signs on barrels at Revere and Fletcher that conflict with fixed signs; <br /> • Seasons Four and Depot should stay as Stop for cars <br /> • Request through TSG a sensor-activated flashing beacon at Hancock intersection. <br /> The motion was approved unanimously. <br />