Laserfiche WebLink
61 – Traffic Safety <br /> <br /> <br />Policy & Procedure Page 9 of 19 <br />iv. AUDIT SHEET: An audit sheet is prepared in the Traffic Office, which <br />corresponds with each citation issued. It shall contain the citation <br />number, date issued, defendant's name and address, the violation, <br />and the officer's name. This audit sheet, when completed, is sent to <br />the Registry of Motor Vehicles. <br />v. LOST CITATIONS: Officers shall write a report concerning lost citations <br />or when requesting a citation be voided. In the case of voiding <br />citations, the violator should be given the corrected copy. The original <br />citation shall be signed and turned in to the Traffic Office with the <br />report for correct administrative disposal. <br />vi. AMENDMENTS TO CITATIONS: Amendments to citations or dismissal <br />of charges shall be processed by the Court Officer and/or through the <br />District Attorney's office. <br /> <br />b. Interfering with the Citation Process <br /> <br />i. Members of the Department are prohibited from ticket fixing. The State <br />Ethics Commission has ruled that requests by police officers for a <br />consideration or a dismissal of traffic citations based on the violator's <br />personal connection with a police officer violates the conflict of <br />interest law. <br />ii. The State Ethics Commission has ruled that ticket fixing is an <br />unwarranted privilege that violates the Conflict of Interest Law.i It <br />states that the ability of a police officer to seek special treatment for <br />somebody because of that person’s relationship to a police officer is <br />the kind of conduct that offends the public and violates public trust. <br />iii. Section 23 of (MGL 268A) the Conflict of Interest Law, prohibits public <br />employees from using their official position to secure substantial <br />privileges for themselves or anyone else, and prohibits employees <br />from acting in a manner that would cause an objective person to <br />conclude biased behavior on the part of the Law Enforcement Officer. <br /> <br />C. Violations <br /> <br />1. Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drugs [1.2.7] [61.1.5(a)] [61.1.10] <br />[61.1.11] <br /> <br />a. Many traffic collisions, particularly those involving a fatality or personal <br />injury, are directly attributable to persons driving under the influence of <br />alcohol and/or drugs. In all contacts with violators, the officer should be <br />aware of the possibility the driver may be under the influence of alcohol or <br />drugs. <br />b. If the officer determines that the operator is under the influence of alcohol <br />or drugs, appropriate enforcement action shall be taken. <br />c. Appropriate enforcement action consists of immediate arrest or, if <br />circumstances do not allow for an arrest, issuance of a citation (for <br />example, if an operator is admitted to a hospital and the officer has no <br />means to affect an arrest before the operator is removed from the officer’s