Laserfiche WebLink
41L-Stop and Frisk and Threshold Inquiries <br /> <br /> <br />Policy & Procedure Page 2 of 8 <br />certain that the individual is armed. The issue is whether a reasonably prudent person <br />in the circumstances would be warranted in his/her belief that the officer’s safety, or <br />that of others, was in danger.ii <br /> <br />Investigatory "stops" by the police are considered "forcible" in contrast to "voluntary," <br />and are, therefore, held to be "seizures" under the Fourth Amendment. The degree of <br />force appropriate to enforce a "stop" in a particular case is dependent upon the <br />surrounding facts and circumstances of that incident. <br /> <br />If an officer fails to adequately enforce a "stop", it could result in the escape of a <br />dangerous criminal or pose a serious threat to the lives and safety of other persons. <br />Conversely, the use, display or threatened use of force to carry out an investigatory <br />"stop", when such force was not justified under the circumstances, could result in a <br />finding by the court that an arrest had occurred without the necessary element of <br />probable cause and any evidence obtained as a result might be excluded. It should <br />be noted that a premature or unnecessary "stop" could sometimes destroy a good <br />investigation, which could have resulted in a valid arrest and a successful conviction. <br /> <br />Police officers should never hesitate to make an investigatory stop and a necessary <br />frisk under appropriate circumstances in order to meet the practical needs of effective <br />law enforcement. They should avoid the indiscriminate or unjustified use of this <br />authority. Such action is not only frowned upon by the Courts but detracts from the <br />professional image of the police by the citizens of the community they serve. <br /> <br />It is the policy of the Lexington Police Department that: <br /> <br /> When an officer has reasonable suspicion of criminal activity based on specific, <br />articulable facts and reasonable inferences an officer may temporarily stop and <br />detain a person or vehicle; and <br /> Once stopped, a person may be frisked for weapons only if the officer has <br />reasonable suspicion that the suspect is unlawfully armed or has reasonable <br />belief that the suspect is armed and dangerous. <br /> <br />PROCEDURE <br /> <br />A. Definitions: <br /> <br />1. Investigative Detention: As used in this policy, includes what is <br />commonly referred to as "stop & frisk" and also the very similar <br />procedures often referred to as "threshold inquiry." <br /> <br />2. Stop & Frisk: The warrantless stopping, questioning and frisking of <br />suspicious persons derived from the U.S. Supreme Court case Terry v <br />Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868 (1968).iii <br /> <br />3. Threshold Inquiry: The warrantless stopping, questioning and frisking of <br />suspicious persons based on a Massachusetts General Law Ch.41§ 98. <br />