Laserfiche WebLink
41K-Interrogating Detainees and Arrestees <br /> <br /> <br />Policy & Procedure Page 5 of 11 <br />suspended for reasons not attributable to the police, such <br />as a natural disaster or emergency.xi <br /> <br />b. The interrogating officers should be certain that the suspect <br />understands the rights that have been read to him/her, as the burden <br />will be on the prosecution to prove that the waiver was valid.xii <br />c. The waiver must be made voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently to <br />meet the conditions of the Miranda decision. <br />d. In determining whether a valid waiver was made, the court examines <br />the totality of the circumstances surrounding the waiver, to determine <br />if the statement was a free and voluntary act. The court considers the <br />circumstances of the interrogation and the individual characteristics <br />and conduct of the suspect, such as the length of time between the <br />provision of Miranda warnings and the waiver, the suspect’s age, <br />mental capacity and experience.xiii <br />e. When the detainee waives his/her rights, the interrogating officers <br />shall obtain a written waiver when possible. A waiver may be made <br />orally or in writing, but a written and properly witnessed waiver is more <br />likely to be upheld in court. <br />f. Silence on the part of the suspect does not constitute a valid waiver.xiv <br />g. The physical and emotional condition of the person being questioned <br />is an important consideration in determining the validity of a waiver. <br />The police should refrain from questioning if the suspect is clearly not <br />capable of understanding his/her rights.xv <br />h. The waiver of rights form can be found on the G: Drive, under forms <br />and documents, and is attached here as attachment A. <br /> <br />2. Competency <br /> <br />a. A suspect must be competent to waive his/her rights prior to police <br />questioning. The question of competency is a question of fact to be <br />determined by the circumstances in each case. <br />b. The competency issue is more likely to be raised under the following <br />circumstances: <br /> <br />i. If the suspect is distraught or very disturbed because of <br />mental health or emotional condition; <br />ii. If the suspect has been wounded or is the victim of shock <br />or other physical impairment; <br /> <br />iii. If the suspect is so intoxicated or influenced by alcohol or <br />drugs that [s]he cannot think rationally or act sensibly; or <br />iv. If the suspect’s intelligence level is so low, or his/her <br />learning and education levels are so minimal, or if the <br />person is developmentally disabled that [s]he does not <br />have the capacity to comprehend his/her rights. <br />