Laserfiche WebLink
February 13, 2019 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br /> <br />scenario ($25.5M full cost/$8.5M Lexington cost) includes a full-sized, multi-use synthetic field <br />surrounded by a 6-lane track with a straightaway; a full-sized softball field with a synthetic <br />overlay for multi-use; space for a potential cricket pitch; a full-sized synthetic baseball diamond <br />with a full-sized field synthetic overlay; 6 lighted tennis courts, 3 with pickleball linings; stadium <br />seating; restrooms, storage; a press box; a drop-off area; a parking area; and an access road. The <br />reduced scope project (Lexington cost $4.9M) includes the full-sized field and 6-lane track and <br />the lighted softball and baseball diamonds with synthetic overlays. The partial-build option <br />would provide room for a future full build-out. <br />Ms. Battite said Lexington, via a series of community stakeholder meetings, identified three <br />elements of the project as most important: lighted multi-use fields; restrooms; and storage. Mr. <br />Pinsonnault and Ms. Battite are now determining how a reduced scope and/or additional partners <br />would affect Lexington’s schedule of field access. <br />Mr. Kanter (CEC) asked for a cost breakdown for the reduced scope scenario. Ms. Battite <br />reported that the Town has received an itemization for the full build but not for the reduced <br />build. Mr. Kanter asked that the cost per element list of the full build be forwarded to CEC. <br />Ms. Manz (CEC) asked if there are opportunities to build turf fields on in-town properties <br />Lexington already owns. Ms. Battite said there are some possibilities; the Recreation Committee <br />intends to put such projects into the 5-year Capital Plan. The Committee will request funding in <br />FY2021 for a feasibility study to look at possible expansion/improvement of existing recreation <br />properties and to examine the development of fields on Town-owned parcels. Ms. Battite noted, <br />however, that it would take longer to develop in-town properties than to join in the Minuteman <br />project. <br />Mr. Michelson (AC) asked about the lifespan of the Minuteman Field elements and what the <br />need/demand levels are for athletic fields. Ms. Battite reported that field lighting has a 25-year <br />warrantee; synthetic turf typically has an 8-10 year lifespan (depending on use); and the <br />grandstand would last approximately 20 years. Lexington’s exposure for replacement costs, <br />particularly for synthetic turf, is still under discussion. Ms. Battite said usage/demand data is <br />now being collated into a document but the biggest need is multi-use fields for sports like <br />lacrosse and soccer. Some newer sports, like cricket and ultimate frisbee, have difficulty finding <br />available fields. Additionally, the high school would like to be able to offer intramural sports for <br />students who are not on sports teams. Other factors such as weather, program expansion, and <br />later school start times also impact scheduling. <br />Mr. Alessandrini (SC) said that with increasing enrollment, an increasing number of students are <br />looking for athletic alternatives to sports teams that have limited capacities. While additional <br />fields would be critical to the Schools’ ability to offer intramural sports, Mr. Alessandrini <br />expressed concern about adequate field access given to the Town at Minuteman High School. <br />Ms. Battite reported that Lexington would have access immediately after school if Minuteman <br />teams are playing away games and the fields would be available on weekends as well. With the <br />full-build scenario, Lexington would have been able to use the fields Monday-Friday 6:00-10:00 <br />p.m. and Saturday and Sunday 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. It is unclear whether/how access would <br />change with partial build or with more partners. <br /> <br />