Laserfiche WebLink
03/20/2019 AC Minutes <br /> Minutes <br /> Town of Lexington Appropriation Committee(AC) <br /> March 20, 2019 <br /> Place and Time: Parker Room, Town Office Building, 7:30 p.m. <br /> Members Present: Glenn Parker, Chair; Alan Levine, Secretary; Ellen Basch; Eric Michelson; <br /> Richard Neumeier; Nick Nichols; Lily Manhua Yan <br /> Members Absent: Sanjay Padaki, Vice-Chair; John Bartenstein; Carolyn Kosnoff, Assistant Town <br /> Manager, Finance (non-voting, ex officio) <br /> Other Attendees: None <br /> The meeting was called to order at 7:36 p.m. <br /> Announcements and Liaison Reports <br /> Mr. Levine reported that the School Master Planning Committee met on March 8, 2019. <br /> Overcrowding is already a problem at the high school, and an additional 400 students are expected <br /> over the next four years. There are plans to move the Inforination Technology Department from the <br /> high school to the School Administration Building. Other space mining options are being explored. <br /> Additional portable classrooms may be necessary. A Statement of Interest has been submitted to <br /> Massachusetts School Building Authority as the first step in applying for State funding assistance to <br /> replace/renovate the high school. <br /> Mr. Nichols reported that he is attending a Resilience Workshop tomorrow from 8:00 a.m. to 2 p.m. <br /> Appropriation Committee (AC)Report to the Annual Town Meeting (ATM) <br /> Mr. Parker identified articles on which this Committee needed to vote: <br /> • Article 16(f): Appropriate for Municipal Capital Project and Equipment; Automatic Meter <br /> Reading (AMR) System: <br /> Mr. Parker reported that the Capital Expenditures Committee had met earlier in the day and had <br /> voted 5-1 to recommend support for this article. Mr. Nichols shared his reservations about the <br /> project, explaining that: <br /> ➢ As meters age, they record less water than is actually being used. However, the Town <br /> does not lose any revenue because the rates charged reflect the fact that customers' <br /> meters do not record full usage. On average,ratepayers pay the same as they would if all <br /> meters were new. <br /> ➢ The project would yield savings in meter-reading costs, both labor and vehicle-related <br /> expenses, but they do not cover the costs on a present value basis. <br /> ➢ There will be some savings from catching leaks within structures sooner because of <br /> continuous readings, but it is unclear how much water will be saved. The consultants <br /> based their estimates on reduced leak-related abatements, but the real savings to the <br /> town and ratepayers should be based on the wholesale rate the town pays the MWRA. <br /> Other comments included, but were not limited to, the following: <br /> ➢ The new program will be a"hosted" system and the updated"maintenance" costs <br /> include the hardware as well as software. <br /> ➢ This is 21st century technology and is ultimately the future for meter reading. <br /> 1 <br />