Laserfiche WebLink
APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE-2019 ATM <br /> Article 17 <br /> Appropriate for Water System Improvements <br /> Funds Requested Funding Source Committee Recommendation <br /> $2,200,000 Water EF debt Approve(9-0) <br /> This article addresses proposed capital expenditures to be made during FY2020 as part of a continuing <br /> program to upgrade and maintain the assets of the Water Enterprise Fund. For general background on the <br /> enterprise funds, and the relationship between the budget process and the water rate setting process,please <br /> see Appendix B and the discussion under Article 12. <br /> A total of$2,200,000 is requested this year to replace unlined or inadequate water mains and deteriorated <br /> service connections and to eliminate dead ends in water mains. The details of the projects can be found in <br /> the Brown Book(p.XI-12). Capital appropriations for similar purposes have been made in most years over <br /> the last decade (except for FY2006 and FY2012,when engineering studies were not ready). The goal is to <br /> assure dependable service with high water quality, pressure, and volume for domestic needs, commercial <br /> needs, and fire protection, as well as minimization of water main breaks. <br /> The amount requested this year is 2.2 times the approximately $1,000,000 annual amount which has typi- <br /> cally been requested under this article in past years. The justification for the substantial proposed increase <br /> follows from an asset management study recently completed by a consultant, the Wright-Pierce environ- <br /> mental engineering firm, which has recommended an ongoing annual expenditure of this magnitude over <br /> the next 25 years to keep Lexington's water system safe and reliable. The asset management plan identifies <br /> areas of vulnerability, aging pipe, and areas with low volumes and pressures; and it recommends the re- <br /> placement of 1% of the Town's water mains on an annual basis. <br /> The costs of this year's water system improvements are proposed to be funded entirely via borrowing. <br /> Unlike recent years, due to a variety of factors, no retained earnings are proposed to fund these system <br /> improvements, although the use of retained earnings is proposed to support certain other enterprise fund <br /> capital projects covered by Article 16 (Municipal Capital Projects and Equipment) as noted in the discus- <br /> sion of Article 12.The resulting debt service costs for this year's borrowing would be borne by the operating <br /> budget for the Water Enterprise Fund for ten years until the debt is retired (see Brown Book, p. XI-12, <br /> Table I1). <br /> If this new,more costly, annual water system improvements program is to be funded going forward exclu- <br /> sively by borrowing, there is some cause for concern. As the projections given in Table 11 of the Brown <br /> Book referenced above show,this year's initial increased borrowing will not have a major impact on future <br /> debt service costs.However,if a similar debt burden of$2,200,000 is added each year going forward,which <br /> would be much larger than the prior debt being retired,the net effect will be a steady growth in the fund's <br /> annual debt service obligations,well beyond the historical amounts shown in the table below. <br /> Prior to FY2006, capital expenditures for water distribution and related improvements were funded by a <br /> combination of enterprise fund cash capital, which was raised in the rates, and borrowing. Subsequently, <br /> there was a transition to funding these ongoing improvements exclusively with debt. While the transition <br /> to debt financing in the enterprise funds mitigates the need for rate increases early on,that change,together <br /> with the fund's allocated contribution to the debt service for the new DPW facility, steadily increases the <br /> 36 <br />