Laserfiche WebLink
Page 67 <br /> March 29, 1976 <br /> On Monday evening March 29, 1976 the Lexington School Committee <br /> conducted a meeting at the School Administration Building. The meeting <br /> began at 7:00 p.m. Present were Mrs. Swanson, Messrs. Brown, Rotberg, <br /> Michelman, and Wadsworth. Also present were Miss Quinn, Messrs. Barnes, <br /> Spiris, Maclnnes, Monderer. <br /> Mr. Spiris on behalf of the central office administrators presented PRESENTATION TO <br /> an engraved Paul Revere bowl to Mrs. Berchtold for her service to the MRS. BERCHTOLD <br /> Lexington Public Schools from 1973-1976. <br /> Student Advisory Committee member David Kahne stated his reactions PUBLIC <br /> to the recent Max-Ed Report. He agreed that the report represented a PARTICIPATION <br /> lot of work and would encourage those writing the role desciption of <br /> the coordinator to preserve student contact as a prime responsibility. <br /> School Committee member Otis Brown read the following statement: BUDGET <br /> STATEMENT <br /> "I am normally unaccustomed to presenting long speeches, however, <br /> because of the unprecedented and shocking news from Beacon Hill with re- <br /> gard to School Assistance for the next fiscal year, I felt a re-review <br /> of our budget was mandated. The hard and painful facts are that, with <br /> a reduction of some $700,000 the State has forced onto the Lexington <br /> property taxes the equivalent of about $2.75 additional on our tax rate. <br /> One must realize that the cuts; $210,000 in Chapter 766, $371,000 in <br /> Chapter 70, and a 55%, or $136,000 reduction in school bus transporta- <br /> tion are far in excess of that which one might have expected because of <br /> declinin enrollments. <br /> 'Although I was personally satisfied that the Committee had care- <br /> fully scrutinized and finally approved a fiscally sound budget, it be- <br /> came clear that reconsideration was necessary and as a result I reluct- <br /> antly suggest the following: <br /> 1. That the new .6 High School Guidance Counselor salary of $7,800. <br /> be deleted. However, a transfer from within junior high or ele- <br /> mentary counseling should be made in order to staff the new <br /> high school guidance program. <br /> 2. Reduce from $21,000 to $5,000 the amount budgeted for the newly <br /> created positions of 4 female custodians at the high school. <br /> The $5,000 will allow an experimental pilot program for one year <br /> and give the committee an opportunity to consider its cost effec- <br /> tiveness. <br /> 3. Reduce tram $20,000 to $15,000 the requested salary for the Stu- <br /> dent Activities Advisor. I am not in a position to know for cer- <br /> tain if this is feasible, however, a $15,000 salary might be suf- <br /> ficient, if not I am sure the difference could be made up in the <br /> personal services budget. <br /> 4. Reduce the request for 2 new maintenance men @ $11,440 each to <br /> one for this year. <br />