Laserfiche WebLink
Page 65 <br /> March 20, 1976 <br /> The final recommendation was to have the position of Max-Ed Coordi- MAX-ED PROGRAM <br /> nator as a 205 days position, and salary placement on Department Head (CONTINUED) <br /> level. Secretarial services were also recommended. <br /> After the presentation members commented. Mr. Michelman expressed <br /> his hope that student contact be a priority; Mrs. Swanson hoped that the <br /> position would be a 12 month position due to the need for extensive plan- <br /> ning. <br /> Mr. Michelman also felt that two types of time frames should be not- <br /> ed--obligated time and free time. Within each of these areas coordina- <br /> tion functions are different--direct student contact being most criti- <br /> cal with respect to free time. He said one coordinates or acts differ- <br /> ently when providing services to students in free self-initiative areas <br /> versus academic and screening activities. All of these ideas should be <br /> scrutinized before deciding on the final Max-Ed role. <br /> Mr. Wilson said a sizable portion of one building would be avail- <br /> able for non-obligated time and activities. Mrs. Swanson then expressed <br /> her concern for the non-self-starter. All students, she said, need ser- <br /> vices. <br /> Dr. Rotberg commented that the report reinforced his belief that <br /> all must be concerned with Max-Ed because the report neither told of any <br /> new program, nor gave specific and complete roles of staff, coordinator, <br /> and student. He felt that prior to approval a specific role for the <br /> Coordinator should be developed. <br /> He also expressed his dismay about the salary level, saying it was <br /> misplaced and could cause contractual problems. Finally, he noted the <br /> danger of a coordinator being involved in administrative details rather <br /> than in student contact time. <br /> Mr. Spiris then suggested the school committee accept the primary <br /> goals of the program. He hoped the school committee would reserve its <br /> vote on the coordinator's role and salary until he could make a recom- <br /> mendation. <br /> Mrs. Swanson said she was concerned that unless the committee ac- <br /> cepted the report it would be interpreted otherwise. <br /> Mr. Spiris then suggested accepting the report except for the last <br /> pages on role and salary. Dr. Rotberg supported the concept of waiting <br /> on the role so that specifics could then be forwarded to assist in mak- <br /> ing a decision. Mr. Spiris suggested a two week wait on the role defi- <br /> nition. <br /> It was then moved to accept the Primary Goals of the Max-Ed Report. <br /> (Yes, Rotberg, Michelman; No, Wadsworth, Brown, Swanson) <br /> Mr. Wadsworth then said there was no need to postpone action. It <br /> was moved : to accept the Max-Ed Report as presented subject to change <br /> of role description upon the receipt and recommendation with- <br /> in a 2 week period from the administration. <br /> (Yes, Brown, Wadsworth, Swanson; No, Rotberg, Michelman) <br />