|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1975-12-01-SC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
School Committee-SC
>
Minutes
>
1975-1979
>
1975
>
1975-12-01-SC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2019 12:36:09 PM
Creation date
3/5/2019 2:26:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Department
Schools
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 232 <br /> December 1, 1975 <br /> 1977 alterations Diamond $1,000,000 <br /> 1978 Estabrook 50,000 <br /> 1978 " Fiske 40,000 <br /> 1979 Franklin 200,000 <br /> 1979 (Summer) " Munroe (Adm. ) 70,000 <br /> (contingent upon #1 and timing) <br /> 5. Consider status of report of Educational Program Study Com- <br /> mittee and its implications to school closing decision. <br /> He noted that he would opt for equal educational opportunities and <br /> reinvest the savings for the students of the remaining schools. <br /> Mrs. Swanson reiterated that renovations and phase out plans are two <br /> separate decisions with the Town Meeting having the final judgment on <br /> renovations. <br /> Dr. Rotberg focused on the enrollment figures stating that in 1990 <br /> we will reach our present elementary enrollment and in 1990 we will again <br /> reach 1965 elementary enrollment, if we use the Government's lowest fig- <br /> ure. All of which indicated caution on any phase out of schools. He <br /> fortified his comment by stating that we might have to build schools in <br /> 1990, if we phase out some buildings. In summary, he agreed that no one <br /> was debating the figures up to 1980 but the only point of issue was <br /> whether enrollment would flatten in 1980 or go up. <br /> Mrs. Berchtold noted that the new data on Lexington may suggest a <br /> beginning of a departure from government projections with Lexington <br /> losing more students than the original estimate. <br /> Mr. Brown stated his belief that if the committee could accept the <br /> 1980 figures then the next 5 years could be evaluated periodically with <br /> any phase out dependent on the conditions existing at that time. He <br /> also noted the Drummey Rosane Anderson, Inc. Report gave the committee <br /> the option of looking at the conditions each year. <br /> Dr. Rotberg said the renovation figures were a "red herring" due to <br /> the age of the report. <br /> Mr. Spiris also agreed that the figures used for the Central Office <br /> conversion at Munroe were as of 1967 but are the best available. <br /> He again reminded the committee and the public that in no way were <br /> administrative needs the priority for any building phase out. However, <br /> if a building does become available, administrative needs should be taken <br /> into account. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.