Laserfiche WebLink
Page 229 <br /> December 1, 1975 <br /> Mr. Charles Code, 15 Flintlock Rd. , Stated his support for the PUBLIC <br /> neighborhood school concept. He expressed his concern that the PARTICIPATION <br /> smaller schools in the center of town were slated for closing. These <br /> neighborhoods, he said, were ideal for families with small children <br /> due to ease of walking, price, etc. In summation he noted that closing <br /> down a school or a facility was not related to quality "pay-off" for a <br /> school system. <br /> Mrs. Catherine Nigrini, 17 Highland Ave. , expressed concern that <br /> the Lexington Minuteman article reported an atmosphere of hostility at <br /> a recent Munroe parents meeting. She wished to emphasize that no hostil- <br /> ity existed at the meeting and parents were attending School Committee <br /> meetings to hear what the School Committee is saying. Parents are in- <br /> terested in listening to the School Committee. <br /> William Spencer, representing the Meriam Hill Association, wished <br /> to remind the School Committee of a letter sent last May from the Associ- <br /> ation to the School Committee which called attention to the concern for <br /> closing any of the downtown area schools. <br /> Mr. Don Blackwell of 24 Percy Rd. , commented on the enrollment de- <br /> cline from a town-wide viewpoint. He noted that the schools projected <br /> for phase out have had fairly consistent enrollments. He also remembered <br /> that Franklin School operated half empty for years. He cautioned the <br /> School Committee about completely closing a facility, Mr. Blackwell sup- <br /> ported Mr. Brown's comments that were read at the beginning of the meet- <br /> ing. <br /> ( Mr. Roland Gubisch, 627 Massachusetts Ave. , stated that the P.T.A. <br /> Boards of Parker, Munroe, Hancock, Adams and Muzzey Schools found it im- <br /> possible to understand why the School Committee is considering school <br /> closing at this time. He stressed that the Educational Program Study <br /> Committee would not report until after January 1, the Cost Savings Com- <br /> mittee noted no substantial savings unless the buildings are sold, leased <br /> or demolished, and that the closing of Munroe next year ran contrary to <br /> all sub-committee reports. He further stated as other factors the sta- <br /> bility of Munroe's enrollment, the lowest per pupil expenditure of all <br /> the Lexington schools, and the Fiske and Franklin Schools, to which Mun- <br /> roe students would be reassigned could not provide the proper space. In <br /> summary, he stated that the P.T.A. might support a closing, if the. rea- <br /> sons were clear. <br /> Mrs. Swanson responded saying that any school closing will be ac- <br /> companied by specific reasons. <br /> Dr. Kenneth Hoffman, Chairman of the Educational Program Study Com- <br /> mittee, requested that a schedule be set for discussion between the <br /> School Committee and citizen's sub-committee. He felt that only by this <br /> mode of operation can citizens feel that their inputs are being received. <br /> Mrs. Patricia Maier, 29 Bloomfield St. , expressed support for Mr. <br /> Brown's ideas outlined in his statement. Her concern was also with the <br /> size of schools. She supported small, neighborhood walking schools <br /> especially in grades K-3. She asked the School Committee if a discussion <br /> of grades or redistribution of grades had been considered. <br /> Mrs. Swanson commented that all alternatives would be reviewed. <br />