Laserfiche WebLink
Page 226 <br /> December. 1, 1975 <br /> A regular meeting of the Lexington School Committee came to order <br /> at 8:00 p.m. at the Jonas Clarke Junior High School. Present were <br /> ( Mesdames Swanson, Berchtold, Messrs. Brown, Rotberg and Wadsworth and <br /> student representative Wachman. Also present were Messrs. Spiris, <br /> Maclnnes, Monderer, Barstow, Barnes and Miss Quinn. <br /> Prior to the commencement of public participation, Mrs. Swanson <br /> read the following statement: <br /> "I feel at this time I must express my concern over some statements CHAIRMAN'S <br /> that have been made that I feel are uninformed or misleading enough STATEMENT <br /> to warrant a statement of clarification. <br /> The suggestion that Lexington plans to close some schools eventually <br /> was originally made about ten years ago and debated on and off ever <br /> since. In February, 1974, after months and months of debate, the <br /> School Committee voted to hire an architect to do an architectural <br /> study of our school facilities. It is now December, 1975, and the <br /> School Committee is planning to continue its discussion of the very <br /> complex problem of what to do when faced with a declining enroll- <br /> ment of well over 40%--from a high of 9609 students in 1969 to a <br /> projected 5692 students in 1980 or a decline of almost 4000 stu- <br /> dents. <br /> At our recent School Committee meeting there was not suggestions at <br /> any time by any member that a definite decision relative to closing <br /> schools be made in a few weeks. What was discussed was the fact <br /> that much work has been done by many people, much discussion has <br /> already taken place, the problem has not gone away and the committee <br /> was asked by its chairman to readdress itself to the matter. It <br /> is necessary at this time for us to restudy the reports submitted <br /> to us, discuss these reports further amongst ourselves and with the <br /> various committees, determine what additional information we need, <br /> plan for an open meeting, set up a schedule to do all these things <br /> and arrive at a decision. We had such a schedule worked out for <br /> last spring which we changed to allow for further study of various <br /> aspects, but the postponement of last spring's schedule did not <br /> imply we could avoid addressing ourselves to this matter indefi- <br /> nitely. <br /> Reference to a December deadline was made regarding the date for <br /> filing any capital expenditure plans for the 76-77 budget. This <br /> deadline is not established by the School Committee, but by the <br /> Town government, and the School Committee members were reminded <br /> that if any capital expenditures were planned for 1976-77 they <br /> would have to be submitted by December 31. Such proposals can <br /> be withdrawn at any time, but it was important for the School <br /> Committee to be informed of the December 31 deadline for sub- <br /> mission of all requests. (As a matter of fact we have been re- <br /> quested for a five-year capital expenditure plan as required <br /> by law. ) This might be a good time to make it clear that the <br /> School Committee's fiscal autonomy does not extend to capital ex- <br /> penditures, and all such expenditures will require approval of <br /> the Town Meeting. The Town Government has requested, and justi- <br /> fiably so, that they be kept informed of our plans and schedule <br /> as the possibility of closing schools does affect the entire com- <br /> . munity, and the entire community should be involved and have input into the <br />